Indexable Drill Insert Geometry for Chip Breaking and Center Drift

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional indexable drill inserts face issues with center drift due to uneven cutting forces, leading to narrow walls and insert breakage at corners, and inefficient chip formation and breaking, especially at high feed rates.

Innovation Solution

A quadrangular indexable drill insert with a segmented backwall for effective chip breaking and a top surface featuring a varying positive rake angle to direct cutting forces centrally and enhance cutting edge strength, comprising multiple cutting edge sections with transitional curves and a protruding portion for chip fragmentation and evacuation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If conventional rectangular cutting edges are used, then the drill structure is simple, but the cutting forces are uneven causing center drift

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrill structureVSAvoidcenter positioning accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting edge is divided into multiple segments including a first cutting edge section, a second cutting edge section, and a transitional cutting edge section. This segmentation distributes the cutting forces more evenly across the drill body, preventing center drift while maintaining structural simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different sections of the cutting edge are designed with different geometries and orientations. The first cutting edge section has a specific angle configuration, the second section is tangential to an inscribed circle, and the transitional section connects them with convex and concave curves. This local differentiation optimizes force distribution without complicating the overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Device complexity

If conventional convex-concave transition edges are used, then the insert structure is simple, but chip formation is unsmooth causing high stress areas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransition edge structureVSAvoidchip formation quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The transitional cutting edge section incorporates convex and concave curved surfaces that provide a gradual transition between cutting edge sections. This curvature eliminates sudden geometric changes, ensuring smooth chip flow and reducing stress concentrations that would otherwise lead to insert breakage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The curvature parameters of the transitional section are specifically designed to control chip formation. By adjusting the radius and profile of the convex-concave curves, the system optimizes chip flow characteristics and stress distribution, improving reliability without increasing structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If conventional uniform rake angle surfaces are used, then the manufacturing process is simple, but cutting forces are high and cutting edge strength is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface fabricationVSAvoidcutting edge strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The rake surface is designed with a varying rake angle rather than a uniform angle. Different regions of the rake surface have different angles optimized for their specific functions: some regions have higher angles to reduce cutting forces, while other regions have lower angles to strengthen the cutting edge. This local optimization improves performance without significantly complicating manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The rake angle parameter is varied across the rake surface to optimize both cutting performance and edge strength. By controlling the gradient and distribution of rake angles, the design reduces overall cutting forces while maintaining or enhancing cutting edge durability, achieving a balance between ease of manufacture and strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Device complexity

If conventional single backwall design is used, then the structure is simple, but chip breaking is inefficient especially at high feed rates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebackwall structureVSAvoidchip breaking efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The backwall is divided into multiple segmented portions rather than being a single continuous structure. These segments are positioned to effectively break chips at various stages of formation, particularly improving performance at high feed rates where chip control is critical. The segmentation enhances chip breaking efficiency without significantly increasing overall structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3778083A1Indexable drill insert
Publication Date: 2021.02.17 KENNAMETAL INDIA
  • EP3778083A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3778083A1 patent drawingFigure 3A
  • EP3778083A1 patent drawingFigure 3B

AI summary

An indexable drill insert (10) includes a top surface (12), a bottom surface (14), and a plurality of side surfaces (16) adjoining the top surface (12) and the bottom surface (14). A plurality of cutting edges (20) is formed by an intersection of a respective side surface (16) with the top surface (12). One aspect of the invention is that the top surface (12) includes a protruding portion (50) and a segmented portion (52) extending radially outwardly with respect to the protruding portion (50) for effective chip breaking. Another aspect of the invention is that a rake surface (48) has a positive rake angle that varies along a first cutting edge section (22) of the cutting edge (20) to lower cutting force.