Indexed Food Product Comparison for Substitute Recommendations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The current food ordering and distribution processes in the food services industry are inefficient and lack transparency, with vendors providing insufficient product information, leading to inefficient sourcing and delivery processes that drive up costs and environmental impact.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing an indexed database and machine learning models to compare food products, provide substitutes, and optimize delivery logistics through a locker system for centralized distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If vendors provide limited product information on paper forms, then the ordering process remains simple, but purchasers lack sufficient information to make informed decisions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct informationVSAvoidordering system
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates digital copies of product information from paper forms and invoices. The system scans paper documents and generates digital product descriptions, specifications, and comparison data, transforming physical paper records into searchable digital formats that preserve all product information while enabling advanced comparison capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a centralized database and processing system as an intermediary between vendors and purchasers. This intermediary collects, stores, and processes product information from multiple vendors, making comprehensive product data available to purchasers without requiring direct complex interactions with each vendor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If multiple vendors deliver separately to various locations, then each vendor maintains independent delivery control, but delivery efficiency decreases and environmental impact increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery efficiencyVSAvoiddistribution system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple separate delivery routes into a consolidated distribution system. By aggregating orders from multiple purchasers and combining them into single delivery runs, the system improves delivery efficiency and reduces the number of separate trips required, thereby lowering environmental impact while maintaining vendor independence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal delivery platform that serves multiple vendors and purchasers simultaneously. The system handles diverse product types and delivery locations through a single integrated logistics network, enabling flexible routing and optimization across the entire distribution system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If paper-based ordering and invoicing is used, then the system remains simple and low-cost, but data aggregation and analysis become difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata aggregation accuracyVSAvoiddata processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical paper-based ordering and invoicing system with a digital electronic system. The system electronically captures, transmits, and stores order and invoice data, enabling automated processing, precise data aggregation, and advanced analytics while eliminating the limitations of manual paper handling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20250315673A1Produce comparison system
Publication Date: 2025.10.09 CUT & DRY INC
  • US20250315673A1 patent drawing
  • US20250315673A1 patent drawing
  • US20250315673A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Ordering and delivery of food ingredients and food service items is opaque and inefficient. A computer system for recommending substitute food products to food service providers is disclosed. The system contains a database of information about food products that is continuously updated. The database is updated by food service providers and vendors submitting information about food products and the system tags the items entered and sorts them into the database. The system then provides recommendations to food service providers of substitute food products by comparing a food service provider's order history with a query entered with items in the database. A method for increasing efficiency in delivery of food products by streamlining the ordering and delivery process is also disclosed. The streamlined system includes options for price as a function of delivery route and a central container location for food delivery to multiple food service providers within one geographic location.