Indium Catalyst One-Pot Synthesis of Disubstituted Urea and Carbamate

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for preparing disubstituted urea and carbamate compounds face issues such as the use of toxic reagents, high temperature and pressure requirements, low yields, and unsatisfactory physical properties of polyurethanes derived from aromatic amines, particularly due to the use of phosgene, sulfur, noble metal catalysts, and selenium.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a one-pot reaction of an amine, carbon dioxide, and an alkylene oxide compound using an ionic liquid-based catalyst system containing indium, which allows for the simultaneous preparation of disubstituted urea and carbamate compounds at high yield, avoiding the use of harmful reagents and enabling the use of aliphatic amines to improve polyurethane properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If phosgene is used to prepare urea from amine, then the reaction proceeds efficiently, but toxic and corrosive phosgene is used and large amount of HCl pollutant is produced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction efficiencyVSAvoidtoxicity and pollution
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the harmful phosgene reagent from the synthesis pathway, replacing it with carbon dioxide and an alkylene oxide compound. This substitution removes the source of HCl pollution and toxicity while maintaining the ability to produce disubstituted urea compounds through a different chemical route that avoids the problematic byproducts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts carbon dioxide, which is typically considered a waste product or pollutant, into a useful reagent for synthesizing disubstituted urea compounds. By utilizing CO2 as a carbon source in the reaction with amine and alkylene oxide, the process transforms a harmful substance into a beneficial building block, simultaneously reducing greenhouse gas emissions and eliminating the need for toxic phosgene.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If sulfur is used to prepare urea from amine, carbon monoxide and sulfur, then urea can be prepared without phosgene, but byproducts difficult to handle such as H2S are produced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephosgene-free synthesisVSAvoidH2S byproduct
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes sulfur from the reaction system and replaces it with an alkylene oxide compound. This substitution eliminates the formation of H2S byproduct while maintaining the ability to synthesize disubstituted urea compounds. The alkylene oxide provides the necessary oxygen and carbon atoms without generating harmful sulfur-containing byproducts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Manufacturing precision

If noble metal catalysts are used to prepare urea from nitro compound, then conversion rate and selectivity are relatively high, but the expensive noble metal catalyst may be easily decomposed because of high temperature and pressure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversion rate and selectivityVSAvoidcatalyst stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive noble metal catalysts with a cheaper indium-based catalyst system. The indium complex provides sufficient catalytic activity for the reaction to proceed with good conversion rate and selectivity, while being more economically viable and potentially more stable under the reaction conditions. This substitution makes the process more suitable for industrial scale-up.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Productivity

If high temperature and pressure are used to prepare urea from amine and nitrobenzene, then the reaction can proceed, but the maximum yield of urea is low as 73%

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction proceedingVSAvoidurea yield
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the reaction parameters including temperature, pressure, and catalyst structure to achieve higher yields. By using an indium-based catalyst with specific ligands and adjusting the reaction conditions, the process achieves over 90% conversion rate and high selectivity for disubstituted urea compounds, significantly improving upon the 73% maximum yield of previous methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

5Productivity

If selenium catalyst is used to synthesize aliphatic urea from amine, then the reaction can proceed, but a large amount of the catalyst is spent since selenium is used in an equimolar amount with respect to the starting material amine

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction capabilityVSAvoidcatalyst consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The indium-based catalyst system functions as a true catalyst that is not consumed in the reaction, unlike selenium which is used in equimolar amounts. The indium complex can be used in small catalytic quantities and remains active throughout the reaction, enabling the process to proceed efficiently without significant catalyst consumption or the need for frequent catalyst replenishment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

6Productivity

If aromatic amine is used as starting material, then the reaction can proceed under high temperature and pressure, but the physical properties of derived polyurethanes are unsatisfactory due to yellowing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction capabilityVSAvoidpolyurethane physical properties
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using aromatic amines that lead to yellowing polyurethanes, the patent inverts the approach by using aliphatic amines as the starting material. This reversal of the conventional choice of amine type produces polyurethanes with superior physical properties, including better color stability and resistance to yellowing, while the indium catalyst ensures the reaction proceeds efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method achieves high yields of disubstituted urea and carbamate compounds, improves the physical and chemical properties of polyurethanes, and allows for the reuse of the indium-based catalyst, addressing the limitations of existing methods while reducing environmental impact.

Implementation Method 1

reacting an amine, carbon dioxide and an alkylene oxide compound in the presence of an ionic liquid-based catalyst system containing indium

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Data Source

PatentUS9273016B2Process for preparing disubstituted urea and carbamate compounds from amines, carbon dioxide, and epoxides
Publication Date: 2016.03.01 KOREA INSTITUTE OF INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY
  • US9273016B2 patent drawing
  • US9273016B2 patent drawing
  • US9273016B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a method for preparing a disubstituted urea and carbamate compounds simultaneously through a one-pot reaction of an amine, carbon dioxide and an alkylene oxide compound in the presence of an ionic liquid-based complex catalyst system containing indium. In accordance with the present disclosure, a disubstituted urea and carbamate compounds can be prepared simultaneously at high yield. In addition, the ionic liquid-based catalyst containing indium according to the present disclosure is economical because it can be reused several times.