Individual Security Circuits for Tamper-Resistant Electronic Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Tamper-resistant electronic devices face challenges in maintaining security due to deterministic security circuit patterns, which can be predicted through localized analysis, and the availability of multiple devices allows for deducing the security circuit pattern over time.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a method to manufacture electronic devices with individual security electric circuits having pseudo-random patterns, where each security electric circuit is configured differently and its electric characteristics are used to configure a monitoring circuit, making it difficult to predict the security circuit scheme.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If deterministic security circuit patterns are used, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but security level deteriorates because patterns can be predicted through localized analysis

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidsecurity level
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental parameter of security circuit configuration from deterministic to pseudo-random patterns. Each security circuit is assigned a unique pseudo-random pattern that cannot be predicted from localized analysis, thereby improving security while maintaining manufacturing simplicity through automated pattern generation and assignment systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different pseudo-random patterns to different local regions (security circuits) within the electronic device. Each security circuit has its own unique pattern characteristics, making local analysis insufficient for predicting the overall security scheme and preventing tampering through pattern deduction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If multiple devices are manufactured with identical security circuits, then manufacturing efficiency is improved, but security deteriorates because patterns can be deduced over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing efficiencyVSAvoidsecurity level
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements parameter changes by assigning unique pseudo-random pattern parameters to each security circuit instance. This allows mass production with high efficiency while ensuring that each device has distinct security characteristics that cannot be deduced from other devices, even when multiple devices are manufactured with identical functional structures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the security circuit design into a standardized functional structure combined with unique pseudo-random pattern segments. This segmentation enables efficient manufacturing of identical functional components while incorporating individualized security patterns that prevent cross-device pattern deduction and enhance overall security

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If security circuits are made thin and arranged in low-pitch meshes, then detection difficulty is improved, but vulnerability increases due to shunting that insulates portions of the circuit

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection difficultyVSAvoidsecurity circuit integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the monitoring approach by measuring electrical characteristics (such as resistance) of the thin security circuits and comparing them against expected ranges for their specific pseudo-random patterns. This allows detection of shunting events that insulate circuit portions, as the electrical characteristics would deviate from the expected values for the unique pattern being monitored

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10388127B2Electronic devices with individual security circuits
Publication Date: 2019.08.20 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10388127B2 patent drawing
  • US10388127B2 patent drawing
  • US10388127B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Manufacturing a batch is provided which includes a plurality of items of an electronic device, the items including a plurality of corresponding main modules having a same functional structure substantially identical for the items. The method includes defining at least one security electric circuit, of an enclosure component for enclosing each item, adapted to protect the item from tampering, the security electric circuits having individual configurations substantially different among the items, for use in forming the security electric circuit with the corresponding configuration on each enclosure component. Additionally, the method includes determining one or more electric characteristics of each security electric circuit for use in configuring a monitoring circuit of the corresponding main module, the monitoring circuit being adapted to the corresponding security electric circuit for detecting the tampering, according to the electric characteristics of the corresponding security circuits.