Substituted 3-Phenyl-1H-Indole TDO Inhibitors Selectivity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current TDO inhibitors often cross-react with IDO1 and CYP enzymes, leading to adverse drug interactions and toxicity, and lack selectivity, which is a concern for treating diseases associated with increased L-tryptophan degradation.

Innovation Solution

Development of substituted 3-phenyl-1H-indole derivatives that selectively inhibit TDO activity without cross-reacting with IDO1 and CYP, offering potent and selective cellular activity as TDO inhibitors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If current TDO inhibitors are used, then TDO activity is inhibited, but cross-reactivity with IDO1 and CYP enzymes occurs leading to toxicity and adverse drug interactions

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveselectivityVSAvoidtoxicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by introducing specific substituent groups at defined positions on the indole core structure. Different substituents (R1-R6) are placed at specific locations to create localized chemical properties that enhance TDO binding while preventing interactions with IDO1 and CYP enzymes, thereby achieving selectivity without cross-reactivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs parameter changes by systematically varying chemical parameters such as substituent type, position, and configuration on the indole scaffold. By modifying these chemical parameters, the invention optimizes the inhibitor's selectivity profile to preferentially bind TDO while excluding IDO1 and CYP enzymes, resolving the contradiction between inhibition efficacy and selectivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If current TDO inhibitors are used, then TDO activity is inhibited, but cross-reactivity with IDO1 and CYP enzymes occurs leading to adverse drug interactions

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveselectivityVSAvoidadverse drug interactions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by introducing specific substituent groups at defined positions on the indole core structure. Different substituents (R1-R6) are placed at specific locations to create localized chemical properties that enhance TDO binding while preventing interactions with IDO1 and CYP enzymes, thereby achieving selectivity without cross-reactivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the potential harm of cross-reactivity into benefit by designing a molecular structure that actively prevents unwanted enzyme interactions. The specific substitution pattern on the indole core creates steric and electronic barriers that selectively exclude IDO1 and CYP enzymes, transforming the potential adverse effect of non-specific binding into a beneficial selectivity profile

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Reliability

If current TDO inhibitors are used, then TDO activity is inhibited, but lack of selectivity occurs which is a concern for treating diseases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveselectivityVSAvoiddisease treatment applicability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by introducing specific substituent groups at defined positions on the indole core structure. Different substituents (R1-R6) are placed at specific locations to create localized chemical properties that enhance TDO binding while preventing interactions with IDO1 and CYP enzymes, thereby achieving selectivity without cross-reactivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs parameter changes by systematically varying chemical parameters such as substituent type, position, and configuration on the indole scaffold. By modifying these chemical parameters, the invention optimizes the inhibitor's selectivity profile to preferentially bind TDO while excluding IDO1 and CYP enzymes, resolving the contradiction between inhibition efficacy and selectivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The substituted 3-phenyl-1H-indole derivatives effectively inhibit TDO activity with high selectivity over IDO1 and CYP, providing a safe and effective treatment for diseases related to increased L-tryptophan degradation, including cancer and central nervous system disorders.

Implementation Method 1

substituted 3-phenyl-1H-indole compounds which modulate the activity of tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase, in particular inhibit the activity of tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnzyme inhibition: Enzyme

Data Source

PatentEP3484867B1Inhibitors of tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase
Publication Date: 2021.04.28 CROSSFIRE ONCOLOGY HLDG BV
  • EP3484867B1 patent drawing
  • EP3484867B1 patent drawing
  • EP3484867B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a compound of Formula I : Formula I, or pharmaceutically acceptable enantiomers, or salts thereof. The present invention also relates to the use of compounds of Formula (I) as selective inhibitors of tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase. The invention also relates to the use of the compounds of Formula (I) for the treatment or prevention of cancer and central nervous system disease or disorder, either as a single agent or in combination with other therapies.