Indoor-Outdoor Transition Detection for Mobile Positioning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing technologies face challenges in accurately determining whether a mobile device is indoors or outdoors, leading to uncertainties and inefficiencies in managing positioning technologies and services.

Innovation Solution

A method that uses a combination of initial and additional indoor-outdoor status determining factors, including sensor data and positioning systems, to accurately determine the device's status and switch between indoor and outdoor positioning systems, while conserving power by activating and deactivating services as needed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional positioning technologies such as GPS are used, then outdoor positioning accuracy is maintained, but indoor positioning fails

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning accuracyVSAvoidindoor-outdoor adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs multiple positioning technologies (GPS, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, cellular) that can function independently or in combination, allowing the device to maintain positioning capabilities across both indoor and outdoor environments. Each positioning method serves as a universal solution that can operate in different contexts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes positioning parameters by switching between different positioning methods based on environmental conditions. When outdoors, GPS is prioritized; when indoors, Wi-Fi or Bluetooth positioning takes over. This parameter change enables the system to adapt to varying signal availability and maintain positioning accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If multiple positioning systems are continuously activated to ensure accurate position determination, then positioning reliability is improved, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning reliabilityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts which positioning services are active based on current environmental conditions and transition detection. During indoor-outdoor transitions, the system activates additional positioning services temporarily to ensure accurate determination, then deactivates them when stable positioning is achieved, optimizing power usage while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from transition detection mechanisms (sensor data, signal strength analysis) to control the activation and deactivation of positioning services. When transitions are detected, the system responds by adjusting service activation states, creating a feedback loop that balances reliability and power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If transition detection mechanisms are implemented to switch between indoor and outdoor positioning, then positioning accuracy during transitions is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransition detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The transition detection mechanism is segmented into multiple independent components: sensor data collection, signal strength analysis, transition state determination, and service activation control. This segmentation allows each component to perform a specific function, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Measurement precision

If additional indoor-outdoor status determining factors are collected during transitions, then status determination accuracy is improved, but data processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestatus determination accuracyVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-collecting and pre-processing transition detection data before full status determination is required. Sensor data and signal strength information are gathered in advance, allowing faster processing when actual status determination needs to occur, thus reducing perceived processing time while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP3194891B1Accounting for indoor-outdoor transitions during position determination
Publication Date: 2018.11.07 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • EP3194891B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3194891B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3194891B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A determination of whether a mobile computing device is indoors or outdoors can incorporate any of a variety of factors to make an efficient and accurate determination of indoor-outdoor status. Such a status can be useful for use in conjunction with positioning services. Features such as bounding boxes, activity determination, and the like can be used to strike a balance between power consumption and accuracy. A positive user experience with fewer false detections can result.