Induction Adhesive Composition With Dendritic Filler Heat Transfer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing induction activated adhesives and sealants face challenges such as high cost due to high metallic filler loading, processing limitations, corrosion, abrasiveness, localized polymer scorching, and inefficient heat transfer, especially when adhering and curing polymeric substrates or dissimilar substrates.

Innovation Solution

The use of a polymeric material with a dendritic metallic filler, primarily iron, at a loading of at least 30% by weight, which allows for efficient heat transfer, fast curing, reduced corrosion, and lower metallic component loading, while maintaining high adhesion and suitability for various processing techniques.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If high loading of metallic components is used in induction activated adhesives, then efficient heat transfer is achieved, but cost increases and processing limitations occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat transfer efficiencyVSAvoidprocessing capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical parameters of the metallic filler by using dendritic (tree-like) morphology instead of conventional spherical or flake shapes. This dendritic structure provides significantly higher surface area to volume ratio, enabling efficient heat transfer at lower weight percentages (30-70% vs. traditional higher loadings), thereby resolving the contradiction between heat transfer efficiency and processing capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite adhesive system combining polymeric matrix with dendritic metallic filler, where the unique morphology of the metallic particles synergistically enhances heat transfer while maintaining processability. The composite structure allows the adhesive to benefit from both the thermal properties of metal and the bonding properties of polymer

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Productivity

If high loading of metallic fillers is used, then induction heating efficiency improves, but corrosion and abrasiveness increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecuring speedVSAvoidcorrosion and abrasiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the morphological parameters of the metallic filler to dendritic structures, which achieve the required induction heating efficiency at moderate loadings (30-70% by weight). This optimized loading level, combined with the dendritic morphology, provides sufficient surface area for rapid heating while reducing the total metallic content, thereby decreasing corrosion potential and abrasiveness compared to traditional high-loading formulations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If conventional metallic filler is used, then induction heating is achieved, but localized polymer scorching occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecuring speedVSAvoidpolymer scorching
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the metallic filler to dendritic morphology with extended branched structures. This morphology distributes the induction heating more uniformly throughout the adhesive layer, preventing localized hot spots that cause polymer scorching while maintaining fast curing speeds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the potential harmful effect of concentrated metallic particles (which cause localized heating and scorching) into a beneficial distributed heating pattern. The dendritic structure's extended geometry naturally disperses the electromagnetic energy absorption throughout the adhesive, transforming what would be a scorching problem into a uniform curing process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides fast curing times of less than 3 minutes, efficient heat transfer, reduced corrosion and abrasiveness, and compatibility with diverse substrates, including polymeric and metallic surfaces, with improved processing capabilities.

Implementation Method 1

One approach has been to incorporate metallic filler into the adhesive/sealant material. This approach allows for induction heating of the adhesive or sealant material.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInduction heating: Induction Heating

Implementation Method 2

There remains a need for improved heat transfer from the metallic filler to the heat reactive polymer (within the sealant/adhesive) during induction heating of the adhesive or sealant material.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentEP3704199B1Induction activated adhesives and sealants
Publication Date: 2025.12.31 ZEPHYROS INC

AI summary

An adhesive/sealant material for induction heating including copolymer of ethylene and butyl acrylate and a metallic filler. The metallic filler may be present in an amount of at least about 30% by weight of the adhesive/sealant material.