Induction Button System for Power-Efficient User Input

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

As electronic devices become smaller, space for input buttons and switches decreases, and non-mechanically based input buttons, such as capacitive sense buttons, require constant power to function, leading to battery drain and reduced device usage time.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of an induction button system that uses a magnetic element and coil to detect user input without drawing power from the device's power source, allowing for power generation from user input forces and providing haptic feedback without increasing button stack thickness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If non-mechanically based input buttons (capacitive sense buttons) are used to reduce device size, then device compactness is improved, but power consumption increases due to constant sensor powering

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice sizeVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The button system generates its own signal through electromagnetic induction when pressed, eliminating the need for constant external power supply to the sensor. The user's pressing action itself generates the detection signal, making the system self-powered during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical switches and capacitive sensors with an electromagnetic induction-based button system. This substitution eliminates the need for continuously powered electronic sensors while maintaining input detection functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If traditional tactile feedback mechanisms are added to buttons, then user feedback is improved, but button stack thickness increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetactile feedbackVSAvoidbutton stack thickness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs flexible magnetic elements and thin coil structures that can be integrated into the button assembly without significantly increasing thickness. These flexible components provide tactile feedback while maintaining a compact form factor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of adding thickness in the vertical dimension for tactile feedback, the patent utilizes the magnetic field dimension, allowing feedback mechanisms to operate in a different spatial dimension that does not increase button stack height.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Volume of moving object

If button space is reduced to accommodate smaller device size, then device compactness is improved, but button functionality and feedback capability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice sizeVSAvoidbutton functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The button assembly serves multiple functions simultaneously: it detects user input through electromagnetic induction, provides tactile feedback through magnetic interaction, and generates power signals - all within a compact structure that does not require increased space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines the detection mechanism, feedback mechanism, and power generation into a single integrated button assembly. The magnetic element and coil work together to provide both input detection and tactile feedback without requiring separate components, thereby maintaining functionality while reducing space requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables efficient user input detection and haptic feedback while minimizing power consumption, extending battery life and maintaining device compactness.

Implementation Method 1

Movement of the button cap relative to the enclosure, such as due to a user input force, causes the first magnetic element to induce a current in the coil

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

providing haptic feedback without increasing button stack thickness

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic force: Lorentz Force

Data Source

PatentUS10312039B2Generator button for electronic devices
Publication Date: 2019.06.04 APPLE INC
  • US10312039B2 patent drawing
  • US10312039B2 patent drawing
  • US10312039B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One embodiment of the present disclosure includes an electronic device. The electronic device includes an enclosure and a button connected to the enclosure and movable relative thereto. The button includes a button cap defining a user input surface, a first magnetic element operably associated with one of the button cap or the enclosure, and a coil operably associated with the other of the button cap or the enclosure. Movement of the button cap relative to the enclosure, such as due to a user input force, causes the first magnetic element to induce a current in the coil and the induced current is correlated to a user input to the button cap.