Induction Coil Coverage Control for Stray Field Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Inductive surface hobs with under-covered induction coils generate stray electromagnetic fields, leading to unintended heating of non-ferromagnetic utensil parts and interference with temperature sensors, resulting in inaccurate temperature control and potential user safety issues.

Innovation Solution

A method to determine the coil coverage of each induction coil under a cooking utensil and adjust power accordingly, either reducing or ceasing operation of under-covered coils to minimize stray fields and ensure accurate temperature sensing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If fewer but larger induction coils are used to reduce manufacturing costs, then manufacturing cost is reduced, but coil coverage decreases leading to increased stray fields and sensor interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidstray field heating and sensor interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the coil power operation adjustable and adaptive. The control system dynamically modifies the power output of individual induction coils based on real-time sensor feedback, transitioning from static full-power operation to dynamic controlled operation. This allows the system to reduce power on coils causing stray field issues while maintaining cooking performance where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by using temperature sensors on the cooktop surface to detect abnormal heating patterns caused by stray fields. The control system receives this sensor information and adjusts coil power accordingly, creating a closed-loop control system that continuously monitors and corrects stray field heating and sensor interference issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Object-affected harmful factors

If multiple small induction coils are used to improve coil coverage, then stray field heating is reduced, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestray field heatingVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the power output parameter of induction coils based on their coverage characteristics. Instead of changing the physical size or number of coils, the system adjusts the electrical power parameter dynamically, allowing larger coils to operate at reduced power when coverage is insufficient, thereby avoiding stray field issues without requiring more coils.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If induction coils operate at full power to maintain cooking performance, then cooking efficiency is maintained, but temperature sensor accuracy deteriorates due to stray field interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooking efficiencyVSAvoidtemperature sensor accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses feedback from temperature sensors to detect when stray field interference is affecting measurement accuracy. The control system receives temperature data, identifies abnormal readings caused by electromagnetic interference, and adjusts coil power to eliminate the interference while maintaining cooking performance through compensatory heating from other coils.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by proactively reducing coil power when sensor interference is detected, preventing further degradation of temperature measurement accuracy. The control system takes corrective action before the interference can significantly impact cooking control or safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Reduces stray field heating and sensor interference, maintaining accurate temperature control and user safety by optimizing power distribution across the cooking zone.

Implementation Method 1

an inductive surface cooking surface (1) with a plurality of induction coils (11)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

the induction coils (11) located beneath the position can be assigned to the cookware. The induction coils can then be operated by the inductive surface hob or its control system at the desired power, thus jointly forming the cooking zone for the cookware

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInductive heating: Induction Heating

Implementation Method 3

This also includes installing sensors on or in the cooking utensils, for example, to detect the temperature of the food being cooked and transmit this sensor information, particularly wirelessly, to external devices such as the hob or its control unit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTemperature sensing:

Data Source

PatentEP4383945A1Method of operating an inductive cooking system
Publication Date: 2024.06.12 MIELE & CO KG
  • EP4383945A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4383945A1 patent drawing
  • EP4383945A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for operating an inductive cooking system (1, 2), wherein the cooking system (1, 2) comprises an inductive surface cooktop (1) with a plurality of induction coils (11) and at least one cooking vessel (2) arranged on the inductive surface cooktop (1), the method comprising at least the steps of: • Determining (400) the coil coverage of each induction coil (11) located below the cooking vessel (2), • Comparing (500) the coil coverage of each induction coil (11) located below the cooking vessel (2) with a predetermined limit value, and, • if the coil coverage of an induction coil (11) located below the cooking vessel (2) falls below the limit value, • Operating (600) this induction coil (11) at a predetermined reduced power or • Not operating (700) this induction coil (11).