Induction Coil Assembly Using Pulse Detection for Tool Holder Heating

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing induction coil assemblies require significant manual intervention and adjustment for efficient operation, leading to extended cycle times and potential errors, especially when handling different tool holders, which can result in inefficient heating and risk of tool holder overheating or destruction.

Innovation Solution

An induction coil assembly with a method for controlling the inductive heating process that uses test and control pulses to determine the sleeve section's characteristics, allowing for automated operation by applying defined currents to recognize the sleeve section, set heating parameters, and monitor the heating process, thereby reducing manual intervention and ensuring safe and efficient heating.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual adjustment is performed for each tool holder, then heating efficiency is improved, but cycle time increases and operational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheating efficiencyVSAvoidcycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically detects tool holder parameters and adjusts heating parameters without manual intervention. The control unit reads tool holder data from memory, determines appropriate heating parameters, and executes the heating process autonomously, eliminating the need for manual adjustment while maintaining heating efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical adjustment with an automated electronic control system. The control unit uses electronic memory to store tool holder parameters and automatically retrieves and processes this information, substituting the manual mechanical adjustment process with an electronic automation system that reduces cycle time while maintaining or improving heating efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If heating parameters are not properly adjusted, then operational simplicity is improved, but tool holder damage risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational simplicityVSAvoidtool holder damage risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit automatically determines appropriate heating parameters based on detected tool holder characteristics, eliminating the need for manual parameter adjustment. This maintains operational simplicity while preventing tool holder damage through automated parameter optimization that ensures heating parameters are always appropriate for the specific tool holder being processed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary detection and parameter determination before the heating process begins. The control unit reads tool holder parameters from memory, determines appropriate heating parameters in advance, and prepares the heating process with correct parameters before actual heating starts, preventing damage while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of time

If automated detection is implemented, then cycle time is reduced and operational reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecycle timeVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit serves multiple functions: it detects tool holder parameters, retrieves stored parameter data from memory, determines optimal heating parameters, and controls the heating process. By consolidating these functions into a single multi-functional control unit, the system reduces cycle time through automation while minimizing the increase in device complexity through functional integration rather than adding separate components for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical adjustment processes with electronic detection and control systems. The automated detection system uses electronic sensors and memory to identify tool holder parameters and retrieve stored data, replacing complex manual adjustment mechanisms with simpler electronic systems that reduce cycle time while the integration of these electronic systems into the existing control architecture minimizes overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables automated and efficient inductive shrinking of tools with reduced cycle times, improved operational reliability, and protection against overheating, maintaining high standards of operational safety and efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

induction coil assembly with an induction coil (1), into which a sleeve section (HP) of a tool holder (4) can be inserted

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

thermally expand tool holders using alternating magnetic fields generated by induction coils and the eddy currents thus induced in the tool holders incorporated in the induction coils

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEddy currents: Eddy Currents

Implementation Method 3

After the tool holder has cooled down, the tool is then held firmly and symmetrically by the tool holder. This process is also referred to as inductive shrinking of tools into tool holders

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal contraction: Thermal Contraction

Data Source

PatentEP3740033B1Induction coil assembly and method for controlling an induction heating process for an induction coil assembly
Publication Date: 2024.01.17 HAIMER
  • EP3740033B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3740033B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3740033B1 patent drawingFigure 3~5

AI summary

The invention relates to an induction coil assembly comprising an induction coil into which a sleeve portion of a tool holder can be inserted, and a method for controlling an inductive heating process for an induction coil assembly with a sleeve portion of a tool holder inserted into an induction coil of the induction coil assembly. To increase the degree of automation in an induction coil assembly, it is provided that: - a defined, predetermined (test) current (test pulse) is applied to the induction coil before the start of an inductive heating process for the sleeve portion inserted into the induction coil; - a time/current curve is determined for this (test) current (test pulse) for the sleeve portion inserted into the induction coil; and - the inserted sleeve portion is identified based on the time/current curve of the (test) current.- Heating parameters are defined for the sleeve section inserted into the induction coil based on the detection, and the inductive heating process is started based on the heating parameters defined for the detected sleeve section; - the inductive heating process is interrupted at least once, during which a defined (control) current (control pulse) is applied to the induction coil at the sleeve section inserted into the induction coil, and a further time/current curve is determined for this (control) current (control pulse) for the sleeve section inserted into the induction coil; - based on the further time/current curve of the (control) current, a decision is made as to whether the heating process is continued or finally terminated.