Induction Cooktop Power Control Feedback Loop

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Induction cooking zones on domestic hobs often deliver inefficient power due to mismatched container sizes and materials, leading to prolonged cooking times and inadequate heating for certain cooking types, as existing control systems rely solely on theoretical maximum power comparisons rather than user-set power requirements.

Innovation Solution

A method for controlling induction cooking zones that measures the power delivered to a container and compares it to the user-set power, identifying suitable alternative zones by classifying them based on ratios of delivered and theoretical maximum power, and providing warning signals to inform users of suboptimal zone usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If the control system compares only theoretical maximum power values, then the system complexity is reduced, but the cooking efficiency and adaptability to user needs deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidcooking efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system implements feedback by comparing the set power value with the measured power value delivered to the container. This feedback loop enables the system to adapt to actual cooking conditions and container characteristics, improving cooking efficiency without requiring excessive system complexity. The feedback mechanism triggers appropriate responses such as warning signals or automatic zone switching based on the comparison results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary measurement of the power delivered to the container before actual cooking begins. By measuring the power value in advance and comparing it with the set power, the system can identify suitable cooking zones proactively, preventing inefficient cooking from starting in the first place.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If the control system measures and compares actual power delivered to containers, then cooking efficiency and user satisfaction improve, but the device complexity and measurement requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooking efficiencyVSAvoidmeasurement and control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cooking appliance performs self-diagnosis by automatically measuring the power delivered to the container and comparing it with the set power value. This self-service capability eliminates the need for external monitoring equipment or complex user interventions, achieving improved cooking efficiency through relatively simple integrated measurement and control circuitry already present in induction cooking systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If the system provides detailed warnings and alternative zone recommendations, then user experience and cooking suitability improve, but the information processing and communication complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser experienceVSAvoidinformation processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides feedback to the user through warning signals when the measured power value is insufficient compared to the set power. This feedback includes information about alternative cooking zones that would be more suitable, enabling users to make informed decisions without requiring complex information processing. The feedback mechanism uses simple comparison logic and predefined response protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method ensures closer alignment with user-set conditions, allowing for more efficient power usage and reducing unnecessary cooking time by identifying suitable zones for heating, thus improving cooking efficiency and user experience.

Implementation Method 1

induction cooking zones

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

heating of a container

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentEP3065505B1Method for controlling a cooking appliance and associated cooking appliance
Publication Date: 2022.04.06 GRP BRANDT
  • EP3065505B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3065505B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3065505B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method for controlling a cooking appliance comprising several induction cooking zones includes the following steps: - acquisition (S1) of a setpoint power (P1c) associated with a first cooking zone (F1) covered by a pan; - measurement (S2) of a representative value of the power (P1m) delivered to said pan placed on the first cooking zone (F1); and - comparison (S3) of the measured value (P1m) and a representative value of the setpoint power (P1c), the first cooking zone (F1) being considered suitable for heating the pan when a ratio between the measured value (P1m) and the representative value of the setpoint power (P1c) is greater than a predefined threshold. Use in an induction cooktop.