Induction Cookware Signal Control With Hob Presence Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing inductive cooking systems face challenges in ensuring user safety and compliance with standards by preventing remote control between cookware and cooktops, while also requiring additional user interactions for function selection and parameter settings.

Innovation Solution

An inductive system that allows users to select functions and parameters directly on the cookware, using inductive power for signal transmission and energy harvesting, eliminating the need for additional energy storage and reducing the need for user interaction with the cooktop controls.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If users can select cooking functions on cookware independently, then user convenience is improved, but safety risks increase due to potential long-distance effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser convenienceVSAvoidlong-distance effects
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary verification mechanism where the receiving unit on the hob confirms the presence and position of cookware before executing remote control commands. This intermediary step ensures that cookware is properly positioned on the hotplate before allowing function selection, thereby preventing long-distance effects while maintaining user convenience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary verification by detecting cookware presence and position before enabling the selection of cooking functions. The receiving unit validates that cookware is correctly placed on the hotplate before the control unit processes any remote control commands, preventing safety issues before they can occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Device complexity

If controls are shifted to cookware, then hob design simplicity is improved, but communication reliability may worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehob design simplicityVSAvoidcommunication reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the receiving unit on the hob sends confirmation signals back to the cookware to verify successful signal reception and proper cookware positioning. This two-way communication ensures reliability by confirming that commands were received and executed correctly, while maintaining the simplified hob design with controls on the cookware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If only one actuating element is used, then device complexity is reduced, but functional versatility is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuating element countVSAvoidcooking function selection
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the single actuating element on the cookware multi-functional by programming it to perform different operations based on the system state. The same button can initialize pairing, select cooking functions, adjust power levels, and control cooking programs, thereby achieving high versatility with minimal physical controls and maintaining simple hob design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables safe and efficient operation of inductive cooking systems by allowing direct function selection on cookware, reducing energy storage requirements, and minimizing user effort, while ensuring compliance with safety standards.

Implementation Method 1

transmission of a second signal from the transmitting unit of the induction device when the induction device is inductively supplied by the induction point

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

inductively operating at least the induction point of the induction device with a first predetermined power for a predetermined period of time

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInductive heating: Induction Heating

Data Source

PatentEP3927113B1Method for operating an inductive system, preferably of an inductive cooking system
Publication Date: 2026.05.13 MIELE & CO KG
  • EP3927113B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3927113B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for operating an inductive system (1), preferably an inductive cooking system (1), wherein the inductive system (1) comprises: an induction device (2), preferably a cooktop (2), with at least one first induction point (21), preferably with at least one first cooking area (21), and with at least one receiving unit (23), and at least one induction device (3), preferably at least one cooking vessel (3), with at least one actuating element (35) and with at least one transmitting unit (38), wherein the actuating element (35) is configured to allow a user to select between at least two functions of the induction device (2) and/or the induction device (3), wherein the induction device (3) is arranged on the first induction point (21) of the induction device (2), comprising at least the steps of: • Emitting (100) a first signal from the transmitting unit (38),• Receiving (150) the first signal by the receiving unit (22), • Evaluating (200) the received first signal by the induction device (2), • Inductively operating (300) at least the first induction point (21) depending on the evaluation of the received first signal, • Emitting (400) a second signal from the transmitting unit (38), • Receiving (500) the second signal by the receiving unit (23), • Evaluating (550) the received second signal by the induction device (2), • Emitting (700a) a third signal from the transmitting unit (38), • wherein the third signal contains information of the selected second function, • Receiving (800) the third signal by the receiving unit (22), • Evaluating (850) the received third signal by the induction device (2), and • Operating (900a) at least the induction device (2) depending on the information of the selected second function of the received third signal.