Induction Griddle Module System for Multi-Stage Meat Patty Cooking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current food preparation systems lack an efficient method for cooking multiple meat patties to varying doneness levels simultaneously while maintaining control over temperature and compression, leading to inconsistent cooking results.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising griddle modules with induction stations and a conveyor system that uses inductive heating to cook meat patties, where each module is sequentially advanced through stations with controlled power output and compression actuation to achieve precise doneness levels, and a controller modulates the heating based on temperature sensors for consistent results.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple meat patties are cooked simultaneously in current food preparation systems, then cooking throughput increases, but temperature control precision and cooking consistency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooking throughputVSAvoidcooking consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The cooking system is segmented into multiple independent heating zones, each with its own temperature control. Each griddle module can be independently positioned in different heating zones, allowing simultaneous cooking of multiple patties at different doneness levels without temperature interference between them.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts heating parameters for each griddle module based on real-time temperature feedback from thermocouples. The controller modulates power delivery to each heating zone independently, enabling precise temperature control even when multiple patties are being cooked simultaneously at different stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If compression is applied to meat patties during cooking, then cooking efficiency and heat transfer improve, but control over compression force and timing becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooking efficiencyVSAvoidcompression control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Compression actuators are equipped with feedback mechanisms that provide real-time information about compression force and position to the controller. This allows the system to precisely control when compression is applied and to what degree, optimizing heat transfer and cooking efficiency while maintaining ease of operation through automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Manual compression control is replaced with automated actuators that can be precisely controlled by the system's controller. This substitution of mechanical control with automated actuation enables precise control over compression force and timing, improving both cooking efficiency and operational ease.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If traditional heating methods are used for cooking meat patties, then equipment simplicity is maintained, but temperature distribution uniformity and cooking precision deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment simplicityVSAvoidtemperature control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Traditional conductive heating is replaced with induction heating technology, which uses electromagnetic fields to directly heat the cookware and food. This substitution provides superior temperature distribution uniformity and precise temperature control while maintaining reasonable equipment complexity through the use of standardized induction heating elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The heating method parameter is changed from traditional conductive heating to induction heating. This parameter change enables precise temperature control and uniform heat distribution across the cooking surface, significantly improving temperature control precision without excessively increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Device complexity

If manual cooking processes are used, then equipment complexity is low, but cooking time and labor requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation levelVSAvoidcooking time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically positioning griddle modules in the optimal heating zones before cooking begins. The controller pre-configures the heating parameters and compression settings based on the desired doneness level, eliminating setup time and enabling immediate efficient cooking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains continuous useful action by automatically transitioning griddle modules between heating zones as cooking progresses. Instead of manual intervention, the system continuously monitors temperature and position, automatically adjusting heating parameters and repositioning modules to maintain optimal cooking conditions throughout the entire cooking process, reducing both time and labor requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables simultaneous cooking of multiple meat patties to precise doneness levels, improving cooking efficiency and consistency by controlling temperature and compression independently for each patty.

Implementation Method 1

A system and method for cooking a meat patty are provided. The system includes a set of griddle modules, each griddle module including a lower plate configured to receive the meat patty and an upper plate arranged over the lower plate and configured to contact the meat patty; and a set of induction stations including an entry induction station and an exit induction station, each induction station including 1) a lower coil configured to inductively couple to an adjacent lower plate and 2) an upper induction head including an upper coil configured to inductively couple to an adjacent upper plate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInductive heating: Induction Heating

Data Source

PatentUS10743710B2System and method for cooking a meat patty
Publication Date: 2020.08.18 CREATOR INC
  • US10743710B2 patent drawing
  • US10743710B2 patent drawing
  • US10743710B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One variation of a system for cooking food includes: a griddle module including a lower plate configured to receive a food product and an upper plate arranged over the lower plate and configured to contact the food product; a set of induction stations, each induction station including a lower coil configured to inductively couple to the lower plate when the griddle module is arranged in the induction station and an upper coil configured to inductively couple to the upper plate when the griddle module is arranged in the induction station; a hub configured to support the lower plate and the upper plate between the upper and lower coils of the induction stations and to sequentially position the griddle module through the set of induction stations; and a controller configured to drive the upper and lower coils to heat the food product between the lower plate and the upper plate.