Induction Heating for Explosive Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The proliferation of insects and other offending objects in food and agricultural areas, along with the decreased effectiveness of pesticides, leads to crop damage and safety concerns, while undetonated explosives and drones pose security threats.

Innovation Solution

A computer image analysis system that captures images of substrates to identify offending objects, using processors and induction heat sources to detect and respond to metallic components of explosives, and electromagnetic radiation to heat and detect metallic objects, with action arms for removal or detonation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If pesticides are used to control insects, then crop protection is improved, but environmental harm and resistance development worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrop protectionVSAvoidenvironmental harm
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces chemical pest control (pesticides) with an automated mechanical system consisting of image capture devices, image processing systems, and robotic action heads that physically remove insects from crops, eliminating the need for chemical substances and their associated environmental harms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables autonomous crop protection by automatically detecting insects through image capture, processing images to identify pest locations, and deploying robotic actions to remove insects without human intervention or chemical substances

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If manual inspection is used to detect offending objects, then detection capability is improved, but labor requirements and time consumption worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual visual inspection with an automated system comprising image capture devices that electronically detect offending objects, image processing systems that analyze and identify objects, and robotic action heads that execute removal actions, thereby eliminating labor requirements and time consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The automated inspection system operates continuously without interruption, as image capture devices can monitor crops around the clock and the processing system analyzes images instantly, providing continuous protection without the breaks and limitations of manual inspection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Reliability

If widespread pesticide application is used, then crop protection coverage is improved, but environmental contamination worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrop protection coverageVSAvoidenvironmental contamination
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of applying pesticides throughout the entire crop area, the system uses image capture to locate specific insects and directs robotic action heads to remove only the affected individual insects, applying protection locally rather than universally and eliminating environmental contamination from chemical application

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Effectively identifies and mitigates insects, explosives, and other objects by enabling targeted removal or neutralization, enhancing food safety and security without the need for widespread pesticide use or manual inspection.

Implementation Method 1

The induction heat source is configured to emit radiation to heat a metallic component of an explosive device by way of induction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic Induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

The induction heat source is configured to emit radiation to heat a metallic component of an explosive device by way of induction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInduction Heating: Induction Heating

Implementation Method 3

a temperature sensor in communication with the processor that is configured to detect heat emitted from the metallic component of the explosive device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal Radiation: Thermal Radiation

Data Source

PatentUS10425996B1Induction heating systems
Publication Date: 2019.09.24 FRYSHMAN BERNARD
  • US10425996B1 patent drawing
  • US10425996B1 patent drawing
  • US10425996B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An induction heating system includes a base having a controller and an electromagnetic radiation source in communication with the controller. The electromagnetic radiation source is configured to emit radiation. The base also includes a mounting surface configured to receive one of a plurality of interchangeable heating surfaces. The system further includes a heating surface mounted to the mounting surface of the base. The heating surface includes a ferromagnetic material that heats via induction responsive to the radiation emitted by the electromagnetic radiation source.