Induction Heating for Metallic Component Detection in Security Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The proliferation of insects and other offending objects in food and agricultural areas, along with the ineffectiveness of current pesticides, leads to crop damage and safety concerns, while undetonated explosives and drones pose security threats.

Innovation Solution

A computer image analysis system equipped with a processor, induction heat source, and action arm that identifies and responds to offending objects by emitting radiation to heat metallic components, detecting heat, and conducting detonation attempts or other remedial actions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If induction heating is used to detect metallic components of explosives, then detection capability is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The induction heating system operates by applying electromagnetic energy periodically to metallic components, enabling detection through periodic heating cycles rather than continuous operation, thus reducing overall energy consumption while maintaining detection capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the thermal parameters of metallic components through induction heating, transforming them from ambient temperature to elevated temperature states that can be detected by thermal sensors, thereby improving detection precision without requiring continuous high energy input

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If image analysis system is used to identify offending objects, then detection accuracy is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detection system is segmented into distinct functional modules: image capture subsystem, image analysis subsystem, induction heating subsystem, and action response subsystem. Each module performs a specific function and can operate independently, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high detection accuracy through specialized processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The image analysis system acts as an intermediary between the induction heating system and the action response system, processing visual information to identify offending objects and triggering appropriate responses, thereby simplifying the overall system architecture through functional mediation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If action arm conducts detonation attempt, then security effectiveness is improved, but risk of harmful effects increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity effectivenessVSAvoidrisk of harmful effects
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection and identification of explosive objects using image analysis and induction heating before attempting detonation, ensuring that only confirmed threats are targeted, thereby reducing the risk of harmful effects from mistaken identity or unnecessary actions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where thermal sensors monitor the heating process and image analysis continuously assesses the target, allowing real-time adjustment of the detonation attempt parameters to minimize harmful effects while maintaining security effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Effectively detects and mitigates insects, explosives, and other objects by automatically identifying and neutralizing threats, reducing crop damage and enhancing security without the need for widespread pesticide use.

Implementation Method 1

The induction heat source is configured to emit radiation to heat a metallic component of an explosive device by way of induction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

a temperature sensor in communication with the processor that is configured to detect heat emitted from the metallic component of the explosive device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal radiation: Thermal Radiation

Data Source

PatentUS10339426B2Induction system for crowd monitoring
Publication Date: 2019.07.02 FRYSHMAN BERNARD
  • US10339426B2 patent drawing
  • US10339426B2 patent drawing
  • US10339426B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for monitoring an area includes a processor and an electromagnetic radiation source in communication with the processor. The electromagnetic radiation source is configured to emit radiation to heat a metallic object that is in or carried by a target. The system also includes an array of temperature sensors in communication with the processor, where the array of temperature sensors is configured to detect a first temperature associated with the target and a second temperature associated with the target. The first temperature is detected prior to emission of the radiation and the second temperature is detected subsequent to emission of the radiation. The processor is also configured to determine whether to trigger an alert based at least in part on a difference between the first temperature and the second temperature.