Induction Hob Coil Stacking for Uniform Thermal Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Induction hobs face inefficiencies in power distribution, installation space, component efficiency, and cost efficiency, with existing designs often resulting in non-uniform thermal distribution and increased magnetic interferences.

Innovation Solution

The induction hob device features a configuration where second coil portions are located between first and further coil portions, with optimized spatial arrangements and overlapping areas to enhance power distribution and thermal uniformity, utilizing a retainer unit and control unit for efficient operation and reduced magnetic interferences.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If inductors are arranged in-plane and distanced from each other, then manufacturing and installation are simplified, but power distribution efficiency deteriorates and thermal distribution becomes non-uniform

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinductor arrangementVSAvoidpower distribution efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from traditional in-plane (2D) inductor arrangement to a three-dimensional stacked configuration where coil portions are arranged at different vertical levels. Second coil portions are positioned between first and further first coil portions in the vertical dimension, enabling improved power distribution efficiency while maintaining manufacturing simplicity through modular assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a nested arrangement where second coil portions are embedded within the vertical space between first and further first coil portions. This nesting approach allows multiple inductors to occupy overlapping horizontal footprints at different vertical levels, increasing power distribution efficiency without increasing the horizontal installation footprint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Area of stationary object

If inductors are arranged in-plane and distanced from each other, then installation space requirements are reduced, but thermal distribution uniformity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation spaceVSAvoidthermal distribution uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses vertical stacking to achieve better thermal distribution uniformity without increasing horizontal installation space. By arranging coil portions at different vertical levels with controlled overlapping, the magnetic fields interact to produce more uniform heating patterns across the cooktop surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by positioning second coil portions specifically in regions where thermal enhancement is needed. The overlapping areas between different coil portions are strategically designed to create localized magnetic field interactions that improve thermal distribution uniformity in specific zones of the cooktop.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If coil portions are arranged with overlapping configurations, then power efficiency and thermal uniformity improve, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower efficiencyVSAvoidcoil arrangement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the inductor system into distinct first and second coil portions that can be manufactured and assembled separately. This segmentation allows for standardized modular components with controlled overlapping, improving power efficiency while managing device complexity through modular design and standardized interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Area of stationary object

If second coil portions are located between first and further first coil portions, then installation space efficiency improves, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation space efficiencyVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves the manufacturing complexity issue by moving the complex overlapping arrangement to the vertical dimension rather than the horizontal plane. Second coil portions are positioned between first and further first coil portions in the vertical stack, achieving high installation space efficiency while allowing each coil portion to be manufactured as a standard component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration improves power efficiency, installation space efficiency, cost efficiency, and flexibility, achieving uniform thermal distribution and reduced magnetic interferences, leading to a more efficient and cost-effective induction hob design.

Implementation Method 1

the inductor is provided to generate an alternating electromagnetic field, which is converted into heat in a bottom of a cooking utensil by means of eddy currents and/or magnetization and demagnetization effects

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

the inductor is provided to generate an alternating electromagnetic field, which is converted into heat in a bottom of a cooking utensil by means of eddy currents and/or magnetization and demagnetization effects

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEddy currents: Eddy Currents

Implementation Method 3

the inductor is provided to generate an alternating electromagnetic field, which is converted into heat in a bottom of a cooking utensil by means of eddy currents and/or magnetization and demagnetization effects

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetization and demagnetization effects: Magnetic Hysteresis

Data Source

PatentEP3395125B1An induction hob device and a method for manufacturing an induction hob device
Publication Date: 2021.04.21 BOSCH SIEMENS HAUSGERATE GMBH
  • EP3395125B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3395125B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3395125B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

The invention relates to an induction hob device comprising at least one cooktop (10a-10i), at least one first inductor (12a –12i) having at least one first coil portion (14a; 14d) and at least one further first coil portion (16a; 16d), and at least one second inductor (18a –18i) having at least one second coil portion (20a; 20d). In order to improve an efficiency,it is proposed that the second coil portion (20a; 20d) is at least partly located between the first coil portion (14a; 14d) and the further first coil portion (16a; 16d).