Induction Hob Polymeric Frame Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing induction cooking heaters face challenges in production complexity, energy efficiency, and material costs due to the use of thick plastic frames that increase the distance between inductor windings and ceramic glass, making the manufacturing process difficult and inefficient.

Innovation Solution

A polymeric frame with a first support element for coil winding and a second support element for magnetic field concentration bars, assembled through a snap engagement mechanism, reduces the distance between windings and glass, allowing for a more efficient design that uses less material and simplifies the assembly process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If a thick plastic frame is used to support the inductor and ferrite bars, then the structural stability is improved, but the distance between the inductor windings and ceramic glass increases, leading to decreased energy efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidenergy efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The plastic frame is divided into two separate elements: a first support element for the inductor windings and a second support element for the ferrite bars. This segmentation allows each element to be optimized independently - the first element can be thin to maintain energy efficiency, while the second element provides necessary support for the ferrite bars.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A snap engagement mechanism acts as an intermediary connection between the first and second support elements. This allows the two elements to be assembled together to form a complete frame structure without requiring a thick monolithic frame, thus maintaining both structural stability and energy efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If a single plastic frame is used for both coil winding and ferrite bar support, then the device complexity is reduced, but the production process becomes complicated and difficult to automate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveframe structure complexityVSAvoidproduction process automation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The frame is segmented into two separate support elements that can be manufactured independently and then assembled through snap engagement. This segmentation enables each element to be produced using optimized processes and allows for easier automation of the assembly line, as the elements can be prepared separately and joined automatically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first and second support elements are prepared in advance as separate components with predetermined features (such as snap engagement protrusions and receptacles). This preliminary preparation simplifies the final assembly process and enables automated assembly operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of manufacture

If a single polymeric material is used for the entire frame, then the manufacturing process is simplified, but the material cost increases due to the need to withstand high temperatures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing process simplicityVSAvoidmaterial cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Different polymeric materials are used for the first and second support elements based on their specific temperature requirements. The first support element (for windings) can use a material optimized for its temperature range, while the second support element (for ferrite bars) uses a material suited for its different thermal conditions. This local differentiation reduces overall material costs while maintaining manufacturing simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The frame structure employs composite construction with different polymeric materials in different sections. This allows each section to use the most cost-effective material for its specific operational conditions, rather than using a single expensive high-temperature resistant material throughout the entire frame.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Ease of manufacture

If the inductor is wound from above on the first plastic frame, then the winding process is simplified, but the assembly line becomes complicated due to the need to flip over the upper frame

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewinding process simplicityVSAvoidassembly line complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The frame is segmented into two separate elements that can be assembled in a fixed orientation. The first support element can be positioned with its upper surface facing upward for winding, while the second support element is positioned below it. The snap engagement mechanism connects them in this orientation, eliminating the need to flip the frame during assembly and simplifying the assembly line process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enhances energy efficiency, reduces production costs, and streamlines the manufacturing process by eliminating the need for flipping frames, enabling higher productivity and cost savings while maintaining mechanical robustness and thermal efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

induction coils present a strong part to part variation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

induction cooking heater includes an inductor having a number of magnetic field concentration bars located beneath the inductor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEddy currents: Eddy Currents

Implementation Method 3

Transform Electrical Energy to Thermal Energy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectResistive heating: Joule Heating

Implementation Method 4

magnetic field concentration bars located beneath the inductor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field concentration: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 5

The first support element and the second support element are assembled together through a central ring-shaped zone having a snap engagement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical fastening: Mechanical Fastener

Data Source

PatentUS10904958B2Induction cooking hob
Publication Date: 2021.01.26 WHIRLPOOL CORP
  • US10904958B2 patent drawing
  • US10904958B2 patent drawing
  • US10904958B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An induction cooking heater including an inductor having a number of magnetic field concentration bars located beneath the inductor. The inductor having the magnetic field concentration bars is supported by a polymeric frame. The polymeric frame includes a first support element on which the inductor is wound and a second support element that supports the magnetic field concentration bars. The first support element and the second support element are assembled together through a central ring-shaped zone having a snap engagement. The inductor is wound on an upper surface of the first support element opposite to the second support element.