Induction Hob Power Distribution for Cooking Vessel Conflicts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hob technologies face challenges in efficiently managing conflicts between multiple cooking vessels on shared heating devices, leading to uneven heating, potential burning, and excessive warning messages, due to the inability to accurately distribute power and maintain even heat distribution.

Innovation Solution

A method for operating a hob with induction heating coils that calculates actual power based on relative coverage and user settings, adjusting power density to ensure uniform heating and prevent overheating by prioritizing the cooking vessel with higher relative coverage, while providing feedback to the operator for adjustments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple cooking vessels are placed on shared heating devices to increase cooking capacity, then the productivity and versatility of the hob is improved, but conflicts occur in power distribution leading to uneven heating and potential burning

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooking capacityVSAvoidheating uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating power distribution to different heating zones based on their specific coverage by cooking vessels. Each heating device receives a customized power density calculation that considers the relative coverage area of each cooking vessel, ensuring that each zone receives appropriate heating power tailored to its local conditions rather than applying a uniform power distribution across all heating devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the power density parameter dynamically based on the configuration of cooking vessels. The control unit calculates and adjusts the power density for each heating device according to the relative coverage areas, transforming the power distribution from a fixed parameter to a variable parameter that adapts to the specific cooking scenario, thereby resolving conflicts in power distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If power density is increased to heat cooking vessels more efficiently, then the productivity is improved, but hotspots are created causing food to burn

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheating efficiencyVSAvoidhotspots and burning
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by preemptively calculating and limiting the power density for each heating device based on the relative coverage area before heating begins. The control unit determines the maximum safe power density that prevents hotspot formation while still providing efficient heating, counteracting the potential harmful effect of overheating before it can occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by continuously monitoring the power distribution and adjusting it based on the calculated relative coverage areas. The control unit uses the coverage information to regulate power density in real-time, ensuring that each heating device operates at an optimal power level that maintains heating efficiency without creating dangerous hotspots.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If simple power distribution rules are applied to resolve conflicts, then the device complexity is reduced, but heating homogeneity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol simplicityVSAvoidheating homogeneity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies self-service by enabling the hob's control unit to automatically calculate and resolve power distribution conflicts without user intervention. The system independently determines the relative coverage areas of cooking vessels and autonomously adjusts power density for each heating device, eliminating the need for manual conflict resolution while maintaining heating homogeneity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter changes to maintain heating homogeneity while keeping control simple. By dynamically adjusting the power density parameter based on calculated coverage areas, the system achieves precise heat distribution without requiring complex user input or manual intervention, allowing the parameter to adapt automatically to different cooking configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If power is reduced to avoid hotspots, then safety is improved, but heating efficiency and productivity decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooking safetyVSAvoidheating efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by providing customized power density to each heating device based on its specific coverage by cooking vessels. Instead of uniformly reducing power across all heating devices, the system calculates and applies appropriate power levels locally to each zone, ensuring safety in areas with high coverage while maintaining efficient heating in areas with lower coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter changes to optimize the power density for each heating device individually. By adjusting the power parameter based on relative coverage area calculations, the system maintains safe operating levels that prevent hotspots while preserving heating efficiency, transforming power distribution from a uniform reduced level to optimized variable levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively manages conflicts by ensuring even heat distribution, preventing overheating, and reducing unnecessary warning messages, allowing for efficient and safe cooking across multiple cooking vessels on shared heating devices.

Implementation Method 1

a first target power value P_TI,1 or a second target power value P_TI,2 is or are specified for a first cooking vessel (101, 102), with which the first cooking vessel (101, 102) is to be heated by means of at least one of the heating devices (15, 25) that is covered by the first cooking vessel (101, 102)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

The hob has several induction heating coils arranged side by side and one behind the other in a heating area as heating devices

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInduction heating: Induction Heating

Data Source

PatentEP3432684B1Method for operating a cleaning device
Publication Date: 2022.09.14 E G O ELEKTRO GERAETEBAU GMBH
  • EP3432684B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3432684B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

In a method for operating an induction cooktop with several induction heating coils arranged side-by-side and one behind the other in a heating zone, target power values ​​are specified for the cookware to be heated. If two cookware pieces at least partially cover a single induction heating coil and their target power values ​​differ, the relative coverage of this shared induction heating coil by the cookware pieces is checked. Based on this, an actual power output of the shared induction heating coil is determined for its actual operation, corresponding to an actual power output value lower than the higher of the two target power values, so that at least one of the two cookware pieces is heated by the shared heating element at a different target power output than the one specified for that cookware piece.