Induction Machine Magnetizing Curve Determination via Square-Wave Excitation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for determining the magnetizing curve of induction machines are either sensitive to sampling errors, computationally demanding, or not suitable for accurate vector control, especially in high-speed operations where optimal magnetizing inductance updating is challenging.

Innovation Solution

A system that applies a square-wave excitation to the induction machine's phases to determine stator and rotor resistances, calculating a magnetizing curve based on these resistances, and using this curve to control the machine's operation, allowing for individualized magnetizing inductance identification and updating.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If single-phase sinusoidal excitations at different frequencies are applied to imitate locked rotor and no-load situations, then rotor resistance identification can be achieved, but the solution becomes very sensitive to sampling errors resulting in large rotor resistance identification error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotor resistance identification accuracyVSAvoidsensitivity to sampling errors
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic square-wave excitations at two specific frequencies (first frequency and second frequency) to the induction machine. This periodic excitation approach allows for determining rotor resistance by comparing responses at different frequencies while maintaining robustness against sampling errors through the structured periodic nature of the excitation signals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the excitation frequency parameter by applying square-wave excitations at two distinct frequencies. This parameter variation enables the determination of rotor resistance by analyzing the difference in machine responses at these frequencies, thereby improving identification accuracy while reducing sensitivity to sampling errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If recursive least squares algorithm is used for magnetizing curve identification, then high precision can be achieved, but computational demands become too high leading to long operation cycle

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetizing curve identification accuracyVSAvoidoperation cycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential information needed for magnetizing curve identification by using simple square-wave excitations and basic electrical measurements. This extraction approach achieves sufficient accuracy without requiring the full computational power of recursive least squares algorithms, thereby reducing operation cycle time while maintaining acceptable precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses computationally inexpensive methods (simple resistance measurements and basic calculations) instead of computationally intensive algorithms. This approach sacrifices some computational complexity to achieve faster operation cycles, making the system more suitable for real-time control applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Ease of manufacture

If curve fitting algorithms with explicit functions are used for magnetizing curve identification, then coefficients can be solved from magnetizing inductance estimation values, but the real magnetizing curve relies on no definite function making these methods not the best choice for accurate vector control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of magnetizing curve identificationVSAvoidvector control accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables the induction machine itself to provide the necessary information for magnetizing curve identification through its natural response to square-wave excitations. By measuring the machine's own electrical characteristics (currents, voltages, resistances) during simple excitation tests, the system self-determines its magnetizing parameters without requiring external curve fitting or assumed mathematical functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP2936675B1System for determining a magnetizing curve and rotor resistance of an induction machine and method of making same
Publication Date: 2019.06.19 EATON CORP
  • EP2936675B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP2936675B1 patent drawingFigure 4
  • EP2936675B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A system for identifying magnetizing inductance and rotor resistance of an induction machine comprises an induction machine comprising a rotor and a stator, a DC voltage bus, and a DC-to-AC voltage inverter coupled to the DC voltage bus and to the induction machine. The system also comprises a controller configured to cause the DCto- AC voltage inverter to apply a square-wave excitation to a plurality of phases of the induction machine, determine a stator resistance of the stator of the induction machine based on the square-wave excitation, and determine a rotor resistance of the rotor of the induction machine based on the square-wave excitation. The controller is also configured to calculate a magnetizing curve for the induction machine based on the stator and rotor resistances and control the induction machine to operate based on the magnetizing curve.