Induction Motor Driver Using Torque Command and Stator Current Phase Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing induction motor control systems face challenges in dynamically controlling motor speed across varying mechanical loads, as they treat the motor as a simple resistive load and fail to account for inertia and load resistance, leading to suboptimal speed control.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for controlling induction motor speed by generating a torque command signal, normalizing it to maximum motor torque, and calculating stator current amplitude and phase commands, which are used to control switching in a switching circuit with a central capacitor, incorporating a proportional-integral controller and phase correction to manage volts/Hz errors and adjust magnetizing current, thereby effectively controlling motor speed regardless of mechanical load.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If the motor is treated as a simple resistive load, then the control system is simpler, but the speed control precision deteriorates under varying mechanical loads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidspeed control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the control approach by changing the parameters being controlled from simple voltage/frequency to torque command signals and stator current amplitude/phase commands. The controller adjusts multiple parameters including torque command, normalized torque, stator current amplitude, and current phase angle to achieve precise speed control while accounting for mechanical load characteristics such as inertia and resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If torque command signal and stator current amplitude/phase commands are used, then the speed control precision is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed control precisionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into distinct functional blocks: torque command signal generation, normalization to maximum motor torque, stator current amplitude command generation, and current phase angle command generation. Each block handles a specific aspect of the control, making the overall complex system manageable through modular design while achieving precise speed control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the controller continuously monitors motor operation and adjusts the torque command signal and stator current commands accordingly. The system uses feedback from motor performance to normalize torque and adjust current amplitude and phase, enabling precise speed control under varying loads while managing complexity through closed-loop control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Speed

If the switching timing is controlled based on amplitude and phase commands, then the dynamic response is improved, but the control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic responseVSAvoidswitching control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller generates torque command signals and stator current amplitude/phase commands in advance of the actual switching events. By pre-calculating the required current commands based on desired speed and load conditions, the system achieves fast dynamic response without requiring complex real-time switching decisions, thereby managing control complexity while improving speed of response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach provides improved dynamic response and precise speed control of induction motors by accurately managing stator current amplitude and phase, accounting for mechanical load inertia and resistance, resulting in efficient and stable motor operation.

Implementation Method 1

Induction alternating-current (AC) motors are advantageous by comparison with direct-current or synchronous motors in that they do not require commutators, contact brushes or slip rings to provide energization to the rotor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic Induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

The switching circuit includes a central capacitor through which all charge flows between the source port and the motor port

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance: Capacitance

Data Source

PatentUS8779711B2Induction motor driver
Publication Date: 2014.07.15 CANADIAN SOLAR SSES UK LTD
  • US8779711B2 patent drawing
  • US8779711B2 patent drawing
  • US8779711B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A switched resonant power converter applies AC to an induction motor. The power converter controls the magnitude and phase of the motor current, and tuning the stator flux accordingly in order to control the motor speed. A preprocessor operates on a speed command signal by getting the user speed command input to produce amplitude and phase-related signals for application to inputs of the power converter control.