Induction Motor Rotor Bar Segmentation for Fast Loss Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current induction motor modeling techniques require substantial computing resources and time, leading to inefficiencies in optimization and accuracy, hindering the development of optimized induction motors within product release schedules.

Innovation Solution

A computationally efficient method involving segmentation of rotor bars, linearized circuit modeling, and constrained finite element analysis (FEA) to determine rotor segment currents and losses, reducing the need for extensive FEA computations while maintaining accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If time-stepping finite element analysis (FEA) is used to model induction motor loss characteristics, then accuracy of loss determination is improved, but processing time increases to days or weeks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloss determination accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The rotor bars are segmented into multiple rotor segments, allowing the model to capture high-frequency current variations and loss characteristics more accurately. This segmentation enables the system to achieve production-level accuracy while reducing computational complexity by focusing FEA only on flux ripple extraction rather than full time-stepping analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the circuit model into a synchronously rotating frame and applies a linearized circuit model, changing the mathematical parameters and reference frame to simplify the analysis. This parameter transformation reduces computational complexity while maintaining accuracy in determining nominal and ripple currents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of time

If other modeling techniques without FEA are used, then processing time is reduced, but accuracy becomes insufficient for production-level induction motors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing timeVSAvoidmodeling accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies FEA partially - only for extracting flux ripple samples rather than performing complete time-stepping FEA throughout the entire analysis. This partial application of FEA maintains necessary accuracy for production-level motors while significantly reducing processing time by avoiding redundant computational steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary approach by using FEA-generated flux ripple samples as input to a linearized circuit model in a synchronously rotating frame. This intermediary method bridges the gap between simplified models (too inaccurate) and full time-stepping FEA (too slow), achieving both speed and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If substantial variations of induction motor designs are analyzed through modeling, then optimization capability is improved, but computational resources and processing time requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign optimization capabilityVSAvoidmodeling efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting rotor bars into multiple rotor segments, the model can efficiently handle design variations and optimizations. The segmentation allows for capturing high-frequency effects without proportionally increasing computational burden, enabling rapid analysis of multiple design configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical time-stepping FEA system with a more efficient computational approach using linearized circuit models and synchronously rotating frame transformations. This substitution maintains optimization capability while dramatically improving productivity by reducing processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12602525B2Enhanced techniques for analyzing induction motors
Publication Date: 2026.04.14 TESLA INC
  • US12602525B2 patent drawing
  • US12602525B2 patent drawing
  • US12602525B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for enhanced techniques for analyzing induction motors. An example method includes accessing circuit model information associated with an induction motor (IM), the circuit model information representing rotor bars of the IM as each including respective rotor segments. Rotor segment nominal currents associated with the rotor segments are determined, with the determination being based on performing finite element analysis (FEA) over a grid and use of a linearized circuit model. Rotor segment ripple currents associated with the rotor segments are determined, with the determination being based on performance of FEA to extract flux ripple samples over the grid, with the flux ripple samples being transformed into a time-varying rotor flux ripple signal, and with the rotor segment ripple currents being determined based on the time-varying rotor flux ripple signal. Losses associated with the IM are determined.