Induction Rotor Assembly via Cold Heading and Impact Compression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional induction rotor assembly methods result in inconsistent and loose fitting engagement between conductor bars and end rings, leading to structural weakness and reduced mechanical integrity due to length contraction and expansion, exacerbated by high-speed rotation, temperature, and vibration.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the projection of conductor bars from a rotor core, placement of end rings with slots, and application of an impacting force to compress the end rings against the bars, ensuring secure engagement and preventing length expansion by minimizing slot volume or using a press to compress the end rings against the bars.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If welding is used to join conductor bars to end rings, then electrical and mechanical connection is achieved, but inconsistent results and poor contact are produced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection consistencyVSAvoidcontact quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the welding process (thermal/mechanical system) with a cold heading process. Conductor bar ends are cold-formed to create heads that fit into recesses in the end rings, eliminating welding variability and providing consistent mechanical interference fits. This substitution resolves the contradiction by achieving reliable connections through precision mechanical forming rather than welding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of manufacture

If a heading operation is used to compress conductor bar ends, then connection to end rings is achieved, but conductor bars become self-biasing and expand over time causing loose fitting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly processVSAvoiddimensional stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-forming the conductor bar ends into heads with specific geometries (such as tapered or rounded profiles) before assembly. These pre-formed heads are designed to create interference fits within the end ring recesses, preventing the self-biasing expansion problem. The preliminary shaping ensures dimensional stability during service while maintaining ease of assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the conductor bar ends by forming them into specific head shapes with controlled dimensions. By adjusting parameters such as head diameter, length, and profile curvature, the design creates optimal interference fits that prevent expansion while accommodating thermal and mechanical stresses during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If die-casting is used to form end rings and conductor bars as an integral unit, then manufacturing is simplified, but mechanical properties vary significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing efficiencyVSAvoidmaterial strength consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the rotor components into separate segments: conductor bars are formed independently with precision-formed ends, and end rings are manufactured separately. These segments are then assembled through cold heading and interference fitting. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific function and ensures consistent mechanical properties without the variability inherent in die-casting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method provides consistent and secure contact between conductor bars and end rings, enhancing mechanical and electrical characteristics, reducing electrical resistance, and improving rotor efficiency and reliability by preventing loose fitting and structural breakdown.

Implementation Method 1

impacting at least one of the end rings, thereby locking the end ring to the conductor bars

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact force: Impact Force

Data Source

PatentUS8720041B2Assembly method for induction rotors
Publication Date: 2014.05.13 BORGWARNER INC
  • US8720041B2 patent drawing
  • US8720041B2 patent drawing
  • US8720041B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of assembling an induction rotor includes inserting a plurality of conductor bars into a stack of disks whereby distal ends of the conductor bars project from respective axial ends of the stack, placing first and second end rings onto the respective axial ends of the stack so that the ends of the conductor bars fit into slots in the respective end rings, and compressing the slots against the conductor bars by impacting at least one of the end rings. The method may include selectively adjusting an amount of end ring material being compressed by varying heights of respective areas of a top surface of the end ring and/or selectively adjusting an amount of end ring material being compressed by varying heights of respective areas of an impacting surface.