Induction Rotor Assembly With Serrated Bar-End Interlocks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current induction rotor assemblies face challenges in achieving a strong mechanical connection between conductor bars and the rotor body, as well as improved electrical connections between the conductor bars and the end rings.

Innovation Solution

The induction rotor assembly features conductor bars with serrated surfaces, which are interlocked with end rings using serrated surfaces on the end rings, providing enhanced mechanical and electrical bonding.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional smooth conductor bars are used, then the manufacturing process is simple, but the mechanical connection between conductor bars and end rings is weak

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical connection strengthVSAvoidconductor bar structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The conductor bar ends are formed with serrated surfaces featuring curved, tooth-like profiles instead of flat surfaces. These curved serrations interlock with corresponding serrations in the end rings, creating a mechanically interlocked connection that significantly improves strength while the serrations are formed through standard casting or rolling processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The end of each conductor bar is segmented into multiple serrated teeth rather than a single solid end. This segmentation allows the end ring material to flow into and lock with each individual serration, creating multiple mechanical interlock points that collectively enhance the mechanical connection strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If conventional smooth conductor bars are used, then the manufacturing process is simple, but the electrical connection between conductor bars and end rings is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical connection reliabilityVSAvoidconductor bar structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The serrated surfaces on conductor bar ends provide increased surface area and improved contact geometry for electrical connection. The curved tooth profiles ensure better mating with the end ring serrations, creating multiple parallel electrical conduction paths that enhance connection reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The segmented serrated structure creates multiple independent electrical contact points between the conductor bar and end ring. Each serration acts as a separate conduction path, and the redundancy of multiple paths improves overall electrical connection reliability while the structure is achieved through standard manufacturing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If serrated surfaces are added to conductor bars, then mechanical and electrical connections are improved, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverall connection reliabilityVSAvoidconductor bar manufacturing ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The serrated surfaces are formed by changing the geometric parameters of the conductor bar ends during casting or forming. By adjusting mold cavity shapes or rolling die profiles, the serrations are created as integral features of the conductor bar, avoiding post-manufacturing operations and maintaining manufacturing simplicity while achieving improved connection reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration improves the mechanical integrity and electrical connectivity of the induction rotor assembly, leading to increased structural integrity and performance.

Implementation Method 1

The first end ring has a plurality of serrated surfaces opposing and mating with the serrated surface of each first conductor end to interlock each of the plurality of conductor bars to the first end ring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical interlocking: Mechanical Fastener

Implementation Method 2

The plurality of conductor bars extends between the first end ring and the second end ring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical conduction: Conduction (electrical)

Data Source

PatentUS20250158498A1Induction rotor assembly
Publication Date: 2025.05.15 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
  • US20250158498A1 patent drawing
  • US20250158498A1 patent drawing
  • US20250158498A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An induction rotor assembly includes a laminated stack, conductor bars, a first end ring, and a second end ring. The laminated stack includes a body with a first end, an opposing second end, and an outer circumferential surface extending from the first end to the second end along a longitudinal axis. The conductor bars are disposed within grooves in the outer circumferential surface. Each conductor bar includes a first conductor end and a second conductor end extending beyond the ends of the laminated stack. The first conductor end and the second conductor end of each of the conductor bars includes a serrated surface having serrations. The first end ring and second end ring interlock with the serrated surface of the conductor ends. The conductor bars extend between the first end ring and the second end ring.