Induction Soldering Iron Tip Temperature Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing induction heating systems for soldering irons rely solely on the Curie point autoregulation, limiting temperature control to a single setting, which is inconvenient and costly for varying soldering tasks, and results in inconsistent quality due to manufacturing variances.

Innovation Solution

A system with a power assembly, magnetic induction heater, current detector, and control assembly that adjusts output voltage and frequency based on user-selected temperature settings and current flow to precisely control the soldering iron tip temperature.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If Curie point autoregulation is used for temperature control, then the working tip temperature is automatically regulated, but the temperature control is limited to a single setting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature regulationVSAvoidtemperature settings
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the heating parameters (voltage and frequency) adjustable rather than fixed. The system transitions from a static Curie-point-only regulation to a dynamic control system where voltage and frequency can be varied to achieve different temperature settings while maintaining automatic regulation through current monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes physical parameters by allowing adjustment of voltage and frequency in addition to relying on Curie point effects. This enables multiple temperature settings by varying the induction heating parameters while the ferrous material's magnetic properties provide automatic temperature feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Temperature

If different working tips are used for different soldering tasks, then temperature requirements are met, but the system becomes inconvenient and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworking tip temperatureVSAvoidconvenience
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the soldering iron universal by enabling a single working tip to perform multiple functions at different temperature settings. Through adjustable voltage and frequency control combined with Curie point autoregulation, one tip can satisfy various soldering temperature requirements, eliminating the need for multiple specialized tips.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system becomes dynamic and adaptable to different soldering tasks by allowing real-time adjustment of heating parameters. The control assembly modifies voltage and frequency based on desired temperature settings, making the same working tip versatile for different applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Temperature

If different working tips are used for different soldering tasks, then temperature requirements are met, but the cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworking tip temperatureVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent reduces cost by making the soldering iron universal through electronic control rather than requiring multiple physical tips. The ability to adjust voltage and frequency provides multiple temperature settings from a single tip, eliminating the manufacturing and inventory costs of multiple specialized tips.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the approach from physical modification (different tips) to parameter modification (adjustable voltage and frequency). This allows the same working tip to meet different temperature requirements through electronic parameter changes, reducing overall system cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If Curie point autoregulation is used, then temperature is automatically regulated, but manufacturing variances cause inconsistent quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature regulationVSAvoidtemperature consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enhances feedback control by combining Curie point autoregulation with electronic current monitoring and active control. The control assembly receives feedback from the current detector and adjusts voltage and frequency to compensate for manufacturing variances, maintaining consistent temperature despite variations in working tip properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system compensates for manufacturing variances by dynamically adjusting voltage and frequency parameters. This active control approach overrides the inconsistencies introduced by manufacturing variances in the working tip material, achieving consistent temperature regulation across different tips.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables precise temperature adaptation for different soldering tasks, improving efficiency and consistency by allowing multiple temperature settings and compensating for manufacturing variances, thus enhancing the quality of soldering operations.

Implementation Method 1

Electrical eddy currents are induced in the working tip of the soldering iron. The eddy currents are generally concentrated at or near the surface of the working tip. Due to electrical resistance, eddy currents lead to Joule heating of the working tip.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

Due to electrical resistance, eddy currents lead to Joule heating of the working tip.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Implementation Method 3

In cases where the working tip is made of a ferrous material, additional heating occurs through magnetic loss or hysteresis heating, which arises from the rapid flipping of magnetic domains inside the material.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHysteresis heating: Magnetic Hysteresis

Implementation Method 4

ferrous materials loose their magnetic properties at the Curie point or temperature (Tc), which means they do not exhibit hysteresis heating above Tc. As the working tip drops below Tc, Joule heating increases and hysteresis heating resumes. In this way, the temperature of the working tip may be autoregulated at Tc without the use of a temperature sensor.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCurie point effect: Curie Point (ferromagnetic)

Data Source

PatentUS9724777B2System and method for induction heating of a soldering iron
Publication Date: 2017.08.08 HAKKO CO LTD
  • US9724777B2 patent drawing
  • US9724777B2 patent drawing
  • US9724777B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A soldering iron system includes a power assembly that provides power to an induction heater at a variable voltage and a variable frequency. A control assembly adjusts the temperature of the heater in accordance with signals from a current detector coupled to the induction heater and a selection made by the user on an operating level selector.