Inductive Component Bypass for HVDC Overcurrent Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Self-commutated HVDC converters in offshore wind farms face damage from abrupt energy discharges due to switching faults, leading to destruction of switches and converters, as existing protection methods are inadequate for high current spikes.

Innovation Solution

A method that employs an inductive component with a bypass, where the bypass is opened by an overcurrent exceeding normal operation levels, forcing the current through the inductive component to convert it into magnetic and thermal energy, thereby reducing peak currents and protecting the electric unit from damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If an inductive component is introduced into the circuit as a discrete element for overcurrent protection, then the protective effect against current surges is improved, but the circuit inductance increases and the conductor loop is significantly enlarged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotective effectVSAvoidconductor loop
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The inductive component is extracted as a separate discrete element from the main commutation circuit. This allows the inductance to be specifically designed for overcurrent protection without affecting the normal commutation function, resolving the contradiction by separating the protective function from the main circuit path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The inductive component acts as an intermediary element that is introduced into the circuit specifically for overcurrent protection. It mediates between the harmful current surge and the protected semiconductor switches, absorbing the surge energy without significantly affecting normal circuit operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Volume of moving object

If a compact inductive component is designed for high power circuits, then the space occupation is reduced, but the mechanical mounting becomes complex and the commutation circuit is significantly enlarged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinductive componentVSAvoidmechanical mounting
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The inductive component is merged with existing circuit elements or structures rather than being mounted as a completely separate component. This integration approach reduces the need for complex mechanical mounting arrangements while maintaining the protective function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The inductive component is designed to serve multiple functions: overcurrent protection, energy absorption, and potential integration with existing magnetic components in the HVDC converter. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated components and simplifies mounting complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Speed

If the bypass is opened quickly by overcurrent to protect the electric unit, then the response speed is improved, but the bypass structure becomes more complex requiring additional sensors and switches

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speedVSAvoidbypass structure
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The bypass opening mechanism is designed to activate automatically in response to overcurrent conditions without requiring external control signals, additional sensors, or complex switching arrangements. The system serves itself by using the overcurrent condition directly to trigger the bypass opening.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces complex mechanical or electronically-controlled switching mechanisms with a more straightforward structure that responds directly to the overcurrent condition. This substitution eliminates the need for additional sensors and control circuitry while maintaining fast response speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution effectively reduces damage from high current spikes by converting excess energy into magnetic and thermal forms, minimizing the impact on the commutation circuit and allowing for compact inductive component designs without compromising circuit inductance, thus enhancing the protection of electric units like IGBTs.

Implementation Method 1

an inductive component converting electric power into magnetic and thermal energy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

an inductive component converting electric power into magnetic and thermal energy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentUS10530240B2Method for protecting an electrical modular unit from overcurrent damage
Publication Date: 2020.01.07 SIEMENS ENERGY GLOBAL GMBH & CO KG
  • US10530240B2 patent drawing
  • US10530240B2 patent drawing
  • US10530240B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method protects an electrical modular unit from overcurrent damage by virtue of an inductive component converting electrical energy into magnetic and thermal energy, in which a bypass bypasses the inductive component during regular operation of the modular unit and current flows via the bypass. In order to reduce current spikes in the event of a surge current without significantly enlarging the semiconductor switching the circuit inductance for the commutation circuit, it is proposed that the bypass is opened by an overcurrent flowing through the bypass which is above a current value that can be achieved during fault-free operation of the modular unit, with the result that more current is forced through the inductive component than residual current flows through the bypass.