Inductive Clamping Sensor Layout for Temperature-Stable Switching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing clamping devices with inductive query units face issues of unreliable and temperature-dependent switching signals due to sensitivity being critically dependent on the distance between switching elements and temperature variations.

Innovation Solution

A clamping device with two sensor units, each having a first and second inductive sensor with overlapping sensitivity curves, allowing for independent position determination and temperature-independent switching signals, enabling adjustable switching points without physical changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single inductive sensor is used to determine position, then the device structure is simple, but the switching signals are unreliable and temperature-dependent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of switching signalsVSAvoidcomplexity of sensing unit
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sensing unit is divided into multiple sensor units (at least two), each with its own inductive sensors arranged at different positions. This segmentation allows independent detection at multiple locations, providing redundant information that improves reliability while maintaining manageable complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple sensor units are combined into a single integrated sensing unit that processes signals from all sensors. The evaluation unit merges information from multiple sensors to determine position, creating a unified system that achieves high reliability through signal integration and cross-validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Measurement precision

If the distance between sensor and signal transmitter varies, then installation flexibility is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to critical distance dependence

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of position determinationVSAvoidflexibility in installation distance
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from single-point detection to multi-point detection along the longitudinal axis. By arranging sensors at different positions (first, second, and optionally third positions), the system creates a dimensional array of detection points, enabling position determination through comparative analysis that is independent of absolute distance variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter being measured from absolute position (distance-dependent) to relative position between signal transmitter and sensor array. By evaluating the pattern of signals across multiple sensors rather than relying on a single distance measurement, the system achieves precision that is invariant to installation distance variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If calibration is required after sensor insertion, then measurement precision can be optimized, but loss of time increases due to calibration procedures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of switching signalsVSAvoidtime for calibration after insertion
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor system performs self-calibration through its multi-sensor architecture. The evaluation unit automatically determines position by comparing signals from multiple sensors arranged at known positions, eliminating the need for external calibration procedures. The system self-adjusts to installation variations through its inherent redundant measurement capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The sensors are pre-positioned at specific locations (first, second, and third positions along the longitudinal axis) during manufacturing. This preliminary arrangement of sensors at optimized positions ensures that the system is ready for immediate use upon installation, eliminating the need for post-installation calibration while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Adaptability or versatility

If switching points are fixed physically, then manufacturing precision is maintained, but adaptability deteriorates due to inability to adjust switching points

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to adjust switching pointsVSAvoidprecision of switching point positioning
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from fixed physical switching points to dynamically adjustable switching points controlled by software. The evaluation unit can programmatically determine switching points based on signal patterns from multiple sensors, allowing flexible adjustment of switching positions without any physical modifications to the device structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical approach of physically positioning switching elements with an electronic/software-based system. Instead of mechanically adjusting component positions, the system uses the evaluation unit to interpret sensor signals and dynamically define switching points, substituting mechanical precision requirements with electronic control flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides reliable, temperature-independent switching signals and eliminates the need for calibration, allowing for flexible adjustment of switching points, enhancing precision and reliability.

Implementation Method 1

Each first sensor and each second sensor includes an induction coil as part of an oscillator. The induction coil of the first sensor has a first distance to the induction coil of the second sensor of the same sensor unit in a direction parallel to the longitudinal axis of the piston rod, from coil center to coil center, whereby the two sensitivity curves partially overlap.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentEP3674035B1Tensioning device with inductive query unit
Publication Date: 2023.05.24 PEPPERL & FUCHS SE
  • EP3674035B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2

AI summary

Clamping device with a housing, a piston with piston rod running in the housing and a sensing unit arranged at least partially in the housing, wherein the sensing unit comprises at least two sensor units, the sensor units are spaced apart from each other along a longitudinal axis of the piston rod and arranged at a distance from the piston rod, the piston and the piston rod as well as a metallic signal transmitter arranged on the piston or on the piston rod are positively guided and movable between a first end position and a second end position, the first sensor unit is arranged at the first end position of the signal transmitter and the second sensor unit is arranged at the second end position of the signal transmitter, each sensor unit has a first sensor and a second sensor,Each sensor comprises an induction coil and an oscillator, and the induction coil of the first sensor is spaced a first distance from the center of one coil to the center of the other in the direction parallel to the longitudinal axis of the piston rod, in a direction parallel to the longitudinal axis of the piston rod.