Inductive Coils with Center Tap Ground for Common Mode Transient Immunity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Inductive structures face challenges in transmitting data and power across galvanically isolated systems due to interference from common mode transients, particularly when using single channels, which can lead to increased size, cost, emissions, and interference issues.

Innovation Solution

The use of first and second inductive coils with center tap ground lines and optimized impedance devices to conduct common mode currents, ensuring counterbalancing currents and reduced electromagnetic interference by symmetrical coil configurations and center tap grounding, thereby enhancing common mode transient immunity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If data are transmitted through a single channel of an inductive structure, then device complexity is reduced, but common mode transient immunity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidcommon mode transient immunity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The inductive structure is divided into multiple channels (first channel with first inductive coil, second channel with second inductive coil) that can be independently configured. Each channel can be selectively activated or deactivated based on common mode transient conditions, allowing the system to segment its operation to balance complexity and immunity requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the number of active channels based on detected common mode transient conditions. The controller can switch between single-channel operation (lower complexity) and multi-channel operation (higher immunity) in real-time, making the system adaptable to varying electromagnetic environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If data are transmitted through multiple channels of an inductive structure, then common mode transient immunity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommon mode transient immunityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple inductive coils are configured to serve dual purposes: they can operate independently as separate channels or work together as a unified multi-channel system. The same physical structure supports both single-channel and multi-channel modes, eliminating the need for separate hardware configurations for different immunity levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The inductive coils are positioned asymmetrically relative to the isolation barrier, with specific coils placed on different sides. This asymmetric arrangement allows selective activation of coils based on the direction and nature of common mode transients, optimizing immunity performance while minimizing the number of actively used channels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Object-generated harmful factors

If multiple inductive coils are used to improve common mode transient immunity, then radiated emissions are reduced, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradiated emissionsVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple inductive coils are nested or closely coupled within a compact arrangement on the same substrate. The coils share common structural support, grounding infrastructure, and isolation barrier interfaces, allowing multiple emission-reducing elements to be manufactured as an integrated unit rather than separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The manufacturing process uses standard inductive coil design parameters and materials that can be scaled. By optimizing coil geometry, turn density, and spacing, the design achieves reduced radiated emissions while maintaining compatibility with existing manufacturing processes and material libraries, avoiding the need for specialized or expensive fabrication techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration reduces radiated emissions and electromagnetic interference, allowing for robust data transfer with improved common mode transient immunity and simplified design, while maintaining reduced size and cost.

Implementation Method 1

first and second inductive coils to conduct respective first and second common mode currents induced by a common mode transient

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS10320448B2Inductive structures with improved common mode transient immunity
Publication Date: 2019.06.11 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
  • US10320448B2 patent drawing
  • US10320448B2 patent drawing
  • US10320448B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In described examples, an inductive structure includes first and second inductive coils to conduct respective first and second common mode currents induced by a common mode transient between: a first ground coupled to a connection between the first and second inductive coils; and a galvanically isolated second ground.