Inductive Component Core With Localized Magnetic Materials

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing inductive components face challenges in optimizing magnetic core properties, leading to increased leakage flux and losses, which result in higher temperatures and manufacturing costs due to the limitations of single-material cores and uniform air gaps.

Innovation Solution

The use of a magnetic core with a central lobe and outer core parts made from different magnetic materials, including a central slug with alternating layers of high and low permeability materials, distributed air gaps, and a flange-like transition piece to optimize magnetic flux distribution and reduce overall dimensions and losses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If a large air gap is used to reduce permeability, then the permeability is reduced, but the leakage flux and losses increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovepermeabilityVSAvoidleakage flux and losses
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The core is divided into regions with different magnetic properties: a central column with lower permeability material and outer core parts with higher permeability material. This local differentiation allows the central region to provide necessary air gap effect while outer regions maintain high permeability to guide flux, reducing leakage flux and losses overall.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The magnetic core uses composite construction with at least two different magnetic materials having different permeabilities. The central column uses material with lower permeability (first magnetic material) while outer core parts use material with higher permeability (second magnetic material), creating a composite structure that balances permeability control with flux containment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Device complexity

If a single-material core is used, then the structure is simple, but the magnetic properties cannot be optimized for different operating conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecore structureVSAvoidmagnetic property optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

Different regions of the core are assigned different magnetic materials optimized for their specific functions: the central column uses lower permeability material suitable for its role in controlling flux distribution, while outer core parts use higher permeability material optimized for flux conduction, allowing each region to operate at optimal magnetic properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The core combines multiple magnetic materials with different permeability characteristics to create a composite structure that can simultaneously provide flux conduction paths and controlled air gap effects, enabling optimization for specific operating conditions while maintaining a relatively simple integrated structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Ease of manufacture

If uniform air gap is used, then the manufacturing is simple, but the leakage flux and associated losses increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveair gap configurationVSAvoidleakage flux and losses
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The air gap distribution is made non-uniform through the use of different magnetic materials in different regions. The central column's lower permeability material effectively creates a distributed air gap pattern that reduces flux concentration and leakage, while maintaining manufacturing simplicity through the use of standard core assembly techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration reduces leakage flux and losses, improves efficiency, and decreases the size and material usage of the inductive component, leading to cost savings and enhanced performance by optimizing magnetic properties and flux distribution.

Implementation Method 1

a magnetic core with a central lobe and outer core parts made from different magnetic materials, including a central slug with alternating layers of high and low permeability materials, distributed air gaps

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic flux distribution: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 2

central slug with alternating layers of high and low permeability materials

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPermeability variation: Ferromagnetism

Implementation Method 3

inductive component with a winding and a core

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentEP2463869B2Inductive component with improved core properties
Publication Date: 2021.10.20 TDK ELECTRONICS AG
  • EP2463869B2 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP2463869B2 patent drawingFigure 4~5
  • EP2463869B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The inductive component comprises a winding (5), center legs (2) and core portions (1a,1b). The core portions contain different magnetic materials having different magnetic properties. The core portions are provided with ferromagnetic powder and ferrite. The insulating coating (3) is formed between the center legs in the core portions.