Inductive Heating Blanket for Composite Cure Cycle Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Thermal curing of thermoset composite parts with areas of different masses or thermal insulation characteristics requires extended cycle times, reducing production throughput and necessitating additional equipment, as existing methods struggle to evenly heat these parts to the necessary cure temperature.

Innovation Solution

The strategic placement of inductive heating blankets on slow-to-heat areas of thermoset composite parts or their associated tooling within autoclaves or ovens, using inductive heating to accelerate the heating of these areas and reduce cure cycle times, while maintaining precise control over the heating process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If conventional thermal curing methods are used, then the curing process is simple and equipment requirements are minimal, but cure cycle times are extended for parts with high mass or thermal insulation characteristics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecure cycle timeVSAvoidheating system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies inductive heating blankets selectively to specific areas of the part or tooling that are slow-to-heat, rather than heating the entire part uniformly. This localized heating approach targets only the areas with high mass or thermal insulation characteristics, reducing overall cure cycle time without requiring complete system redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces inductive heating blankets as an intermediary heating mechanism between the conventional autoclave/oven and the slow-to-heat areas of the part. These blankets act as a mediator that transfers heat directly to the problematic areas, bridging the gap between conventional heating methods and the specific heating needs of high-mass regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If conventional heating methods are used, then equipment simplicity is maintained, but production throughput is reduced due to extended cure cycles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction throughputVSAvoidcure cycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies inductive heating blankets to slow-to-heat areas before or during the conventional heating process, performing preliminary heating action on the most time-consuming regions. This preliminary action reduces the overall cure cycle time and increases production throughput without requiring complete process redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Temperature

If conventional heating is used, then the heating process is uniform and simple to control, but areas with high mass or thermal insulation characteristics are slow to heat

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheating uniformityVSAvoidheating time for slow-to-heat areas
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces localized inductive heating blankets that can be positioned on specific slow-to-heat areas of the part or tooling. This creates a differentiated heating strategy where conventional heating maintains overall uniformity while localized inductive heating addresses specific time-consuming regions, achieving both heating uniformity and reduced cycle time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly shortens the curing thermal cycle by ensuring even and controlled heating of slow-to-heat areas, enhancing production efficiency and allowing for flexible application across various part sizes and complexities without the need for additional equipment.

Implementation Method 1

The heating blankets employ inductive heating to achieve even, precisely controlled heating of the slow-to-heat part areas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInductive heating: Induction Heating

Implementation Method 2

inductively heating a susceptor sleeve in response to a magnetic field

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 3

reducing the inductive heating of the susceptor sleeve when the susceptor sleeve becomes non-magnetic upon reaching a Curie temperature of the susceptor sleeve

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCurie temperature: Curie Point (ferromagnetic)

Implementation Method 4

a heat source such as resistive heating elements, supplies heat to the part through a combination of conduction, convection and radiation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 5

a heat source such as resistive heating elements, supplies heat to the part through a combination of conduction, convection and radiation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Implementation Method 6

a heat source such as resistive heating elements, supplies heat to the part through a combination of conduction, convection and radiation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadiation: Thermal Radiation

Data Source

PatentUS9277594B2Induction heating augmentation for thermal curing
Publication Date: 2016.03.01 THE BOEING CO
  • US9277594B2 patent drawing
  • US9277594B2 patent drawing
  • US9277594B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The thermal cycle time for curing a thermoset composite part in an autoclave is reduced by placing a heating blanket in proximity to an area of the composite part that is slow-to-heat, and inductively heating the area of the composite part that is slow-to-heat using the heating blanket.