Inductive Heating for Explosive Disposal in Large Munitions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for disposing of large-scale ordnance explosives are inefficient, costly, and pose safety risks due to the need for mechanical sawing and high-temperature furnaces, which are time-consuming and do not comply with environmental regulations, especially when dealing with large-format drop ammunition.

Innovation Solution

A method involving inductive heating using an induction coil and a robotic arm to thermally soften explosives within the casing, allowing for controlled release into a receiving space without mechanical stress, using a compact device that adapts to various ordnance designs and minimizes environmental impact.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If mechanical sawing and high-temperature furnaces are used for disposal, then complete destruction of explosives is achieved, but processing time increases to 2-3 days for cutting and 1 week for combustion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplete destruction of explosivesVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical sawing with inductive heating that thermally softens the explosive material, allowing it to be extruded through a die under pressure. This substitution of mechanical cutting with thermal processing reduces processing time from 2-3 days to a fraction of that time while achieving complete destruction of the explosives through controlled thermal degradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical state of the explosive material by heating it to its melting point and then to decomposition temperature. By controlling temperature parameters and applying pressure, the explosive is transformed from a solid state suitable for handling to a softened state for extrusion, and finally to decomposed state for complete destruction, significantly reducing processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If high-temperature furnaces are used for combustion, then explosives are completely destroyed, but energy consumption increases and environmental regulations must be strictly complied with

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplete destruction of explosivesVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces high-temperature furnace combustion with inductive heating that directly heats the explosive material to its decomposition temperature. This localized inductive heating is more energy-efficient than furnace combustion because it heats only the explosive material and not a large volume of air, reducing energy consumption while achieving complete destruction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the explosive material from its container and processes it separately through inductive heating and extrusion. By separating the explosive from the container and processing it in a controlled manner, the system achieves complete destruction with lower energy consumption and easier compliance with environmental regulations compared to furnace combustion of entire ordnance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If large-format drop ammunition is processed using traditional methods, then disposal is achieved, but handling risks increase due to size and mass of explosive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisposal achievementVSAvoidhandling risks
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the large-format drop ammunition by separating the explosive material from its container. The explosive is extruded through a die in a controlled manner, breaking it into manageable portions that can be safely processed. This segmentation reduces handling risks by converting a single large hazardous object into smaller, more controllable portions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical handling and cutting of large-format ordnance with inductive heating that softens and extrudes the explosive material. This thermal processing method reduces handling risks by eliminating the need for mechanical cutting operations that could generate sparks or cause accidental ignition, while also reducing the mass that needs to be manually handled.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Ease of manufacture

If mechanical cutting is used to section ordnance, then disposal preparation is achieved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisposal preparationVSAvoidequipment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical cutting equipment with a relatively simple inductive heating system consisting of an induction coil, heating element, and extrusion die. This substitution reduces device complexity and cost while achieving the same disposal preparation function, as the thermal processing system is simpler than precision mechanical cutting equipment required for large-format ordnance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces handling risks, decreases processing time, and enhances operational reliability by allowing for safe and efficient disposal of explosives while adhering to environmental regulations, with reduced energy consumption and equipment weight compared to traditional methods.

Implementation Method 1

the casing of the section being run over by an induction coil and inductive heating being monitored in order to thermally soften the explosive

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInductive heating: Induction Heating

Implementation Method 2

so that it is sufficient to release the explosive from the casing and a defined and therefore vibration-free movement of the explosive by means of a lowering plate arranged in the recess in an initial state Explosive through the recess into the receiving space under the action of gravity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentEP3861278B1Method and device for removing an explosive substance from a large-size weapon
Publication Date: 2022.08.24 HEINRICH HIRDES
  • EP3861278B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3861278B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3861278B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method for deploying an explosive substance (3) from a jacket (2) of a large-size weapon (1), in particular a dropping munition, comprising splitting the jacket (2) in a region of a maximum diameter (DM). In order to develop a known device so as to thus also design a corresponding method to be more efficient, while exploiting additional cost and efficiency potential and providing increased safety and simplified handling, according to the invention, the jacket (2) is cut open at a transition into a cylindrical portion (4) acting as a separating plane (S) and the resulting opening in the portion (4, 5) is held over a recess (10) which opens up a receiving chamber (11), wherein an induction coil (9) passes over the jacket (2) of the portion (4, 5) in order to sufficiently thermally soften the explosive substance (3) for deployment from the jacket (2) and to bring said substance into the receiving chamber (11) in a defined manner.