Inductive Sensing Device With Active Buffering And Resonant Loops

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Inductive sensing devices face challenges with motion artifacts due to single-coil designs and low signal pickup strength in two-coil configurations, leading to complex and costly compensatory electronics.

Innovation Solution

A weakly coupled two-loop arrangement with a resonator circuit loop and a driven loop, where the loops are radially spaced and connected via an active buffering component for voltage-to-current amplification, ensuring synchronous operation while minimizing noise and direct coupling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single loop is used for both generating and detecting magnetic fields, then device complexity is reduced, but motion artifacts increase due to strong coupling with surface eddy currents

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoil configurationVSAvoidsignal quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The single loop is divided into two separate loops: a first loop for generating magnetic fields and a second loop for detecting magnetic fields. This segmentation allows independent optimization of each loop's function, reducing motion artifacts while maintaining device simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The detection function is extracted from the generation loop and placed in a separate second loop. This extraction removes the harmful coupling between generation and detection that causes motion artifacts, while the loops remain spatially close to maintain signal strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If separate transmission and receiver coils are used, then motion artifacts are reduced, but device complexity and cost increase due to required compensatory electronics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal qualityVSAvoidelectronic circuitry
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The two loops are coupled through a capacitor to form a resonant circuit system, merging their operations into a unified resonant mode. This allows the detection loop to function without complex compensatory electronics, as the resonant coupling naturally enhances signal transfer while rejecting noise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system operates in a resonant mode where the loops oscillate at a natural frequency determined by the inductance and capacitance. This resonant oscillation amplifies the useful signal while naturally filtering out motion artifacts and noise, eliminating the need for complex electronic compensation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #18Mechanical vibration

3Power

If loops are placed close together for strong coupling, then signal pickup strength increases, but direct magnetic coupling and noise increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal strengthVSAvoidmagnetic coupling noise
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The capacitor couples the loops to form a resonant feedback system. The magnetic flux from the first loop induces current in the second loop, which feeds back through the capacitor to sustain oscillation. This feedback mechanism strengthens the useful signal while the resonant frequency selection naturally rejects noise and unwanted coupling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system operates at a specific resonant frequency determined by the inductance of the loops and the capacitance of the coupling capacitor. By tuning this resonant frequency parameter, the system maximizes signal strength while minimizing the impact of direct magnetic coupling and noise through frequency-selective operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration reduces surface artifact effects, enhances sensitivity, and eliminates the need for complex compensatory electronics, providing stronger signal pickup and improved motion stability.

Implementation Method 1

Inductive sensing is based on magnetic induction and has several advantages over conductive and capacitive sensing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

The received signals can be sensed in a quantitative way by measuring an oscillating or resonating frequency of the transmitting coil

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS11918332B2Inductive sensing device and method
Publication Date: 2024.03.05 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • US11918332B2 patent drawing
  • US11918332B2 patent drawing
  • US11918332B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An inductive sensing device comprises first (16) and second (24) loops, the first loop (16) being coupled with a capacitor to form a resonator circuit (20), and the resonator circuit and second loop being coupled via an active buffering component (28). The active buffering component provides voltage to current amplification, and an output of the buffering component drives a current in the second loop. Conductive lines forming each of the first and second loop parts are radially spaced apart.