Inductive Proximity Sensor Signal Correction for F1 Switching Distance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Inductive proximity sensors face challenges in achieving a large switching distance with F1 behavior and reduced installation dependency, often requiring complex training for machine learning models and increasing production costs due to hardware compensation measures.

Innovation Solution

A sensor system that combines classical signal processing with machine learning to determine a correction value for environmental interference, allowing for a fourfold switching distance and F1 behavior across various materials and installation depths, using a detection unit with a coil to generate pulse signals and an additional element for acquiring additional information, which is then processed using machine learning to mask environmental interference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If hardware compensation measures (films wound around core set or additional compensation coils) are used to minimize installation jump, then installation dependency is reduced, but production costs increase and switching distance is negatively affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation independenceVSAvoidproduction cost and device complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces hardware compensation measures (mechanical films and additional compensation coils) with a software-based solution using machine learning algorithms. The system uses a trained neural network to compensate for installation effects digitally, eliminating the need for physical compensation components and their associated costs and complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the approach from modifying physical parameters (adding hardware components) to modifying signal processing parameters. By training a machine learning model with diverse installation conditions during manufacturing, the system adapts software parameters to compensate for installation variations without changing hardware

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If additional compensation coils or films are added to reduce installation jump, then installation sensitivity is reduced, but switching distance decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation insensitivityVSAvoidswitching distance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes hardware compensation measures with digital signal processing using machine learning. By analyzing the pulse response characteristics and using a trained neural network to compensate for installation effects, the system maintains full switching distance without the signal attenuation that would result from additional hardware layers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If classical signal processing (sine oscillation amplitude) is used, then device complexity is low, but F1 behavior cannot be achieved and material independence is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal processing simplicityVSAvoidmaterial independence and F1 behavior
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces classical amplitude-based sine oscillation evaluation with machine learning-based pulse response analysis. The neural network processes the complete pulse response waveform to determine object properties, enabling F1 behavior and material independence while keeping the hardware simple

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses periodic pulse excitation instead of continuous sine oscillation. By analyzing the transient pulse response characteristics through machine learning, the system extracts material-independent object information that would not be available from steady-state amplitude measurements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables a sensor with a high switching distance and F1 behavior, independent of installation depth and material, allowing for type-specific training rather than individual sensor training, reducing production costs and complexity.

Implementation Method 1

The sensor has at least one coil for generating a pulse signal. The coil is in particular fed with a transmission current pulse that in turn induces a voltage pulse as a sensor signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS12007229B2Sensor for detecting an object and method of evaluating a sensor signal
Publication Date: 2024.06.11 SICK AG
  • US12007229B2 patent drawing
  • US12007229B2 patent drawing
  • US12007229B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A sensor for detecting an object is provided that has a detection unit for detecting a sensor signal and a control and evaluation unit that is configured to determine an object property by evaluating the sensor signal, to determine a correction value for interference of the sensor environment from the sensor signal using a method of machine learning, and to take the correction value into account in the determination of the object property.