Inductive Power Transmitter Primary Side Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing inductive power transfer (IPT) systems face challenges in regulating power to the load without requiring complex and costly measurement and communication of receiver-side operational parameters, especially at light loads where resonant waveforms become non-sinusoidal, leading to inefficiencies and instability.

Innovation Solution

An IPT power transmitter with a resonant circuit, a controllable power supply, a switching circuit, and current sensors that adjust the duty cycle or output voltage based on the current ratio to control the power supplied to the resonant circuit, eliminating the need for complex control circuitry and accurate phase measurements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If transmitter-side power control is used to regulate power, then power regulation capability is improved, but system complexity increases due to required measurement and communication of receiver-side parameters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower regulation capabilityVSAvoidcontrol circuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The transmitter controller autonomously regulates power by monitoring its own output current and adjusting the duty cycle accordingly, eliminating the need for receiver-side parameter communication. The system serves itself by using internal measurements (output current and resonant circuit current) to automatically control power delivery without external feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extracts and eliminates the complex communication and measurement infrastructure between transmitter and receiver. By removing the requirement for receiver-side operational parameter communication and replacing it with simple duty cycle control based on output current ratio, the system achieves power regulation without the burden of complex control circuitry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Device complexity

If primary side only control is employed, then device complexity is reduced, but system stability deteriorates under sudden load changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol circuit complexityVSAvoidsystem stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The controller implements feedback by continuously monitoring the output current and using the current ratio to dynamically adjust the duty cycle. This closed-loop control mechanism enables the system to respond to load changes and maintain stability without requiring complex receiver-side control circuitry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If accurate phase measurements are implemented, then power control precision is improved, but cost and complexity increase due to expensive measurement equipment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephase measurement accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces expensive phase measurement equipment with simple current sensing circuits that measure output current and resonant circuit current. By using affordable current sensors and calculating the current ratio, the system achieves effective power control without investing in costly phase measurement instrumentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention substitutes complex electrical measurement systems (phase measurement equipment) with simpler current sensing and ratio calculation. By replacing the need for accurate phase detection with current ratio monitoring, the system achieves power control precision through a simpler, more cost-effective electrical measurement approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution provides efficient and cost-effective power regulation across a wide range of load conditions and coil spacings, reducing complexity and cost while maintaining stability, even with sudden changes in load requirements.

Implementation Method 1

a primary side (i.e., an inductive power transmitter) will include a transmitting coil or coils configured to generate an alternating magnetic field. This magnetic field induces an alternating current in the receiving coil or coils of a secondary side

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

In some instances, the transmitting coil(s) or the receiving coil(s) may be suitably connected with capacitors to create a resonant circuit. This can increase power throughput and efficiency at the corresponding resonant frequency.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectResonance: Resonance

Data Source

PatentUS10819154B2Inductive power transmitter
Publication Date: 2020.10.27 APPLE INC
  • US10819154B2 patent drawing
  • US10819154B2 patent drawing
  • US10819154B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An inductive power transmitter for an inductive power transfer system including a power regulation circuit utilising only primary side parameters to control power flow. The duty cycle of the waveform applied to the transmitter coil is adjusted based on the ratio of the output current of the power supply and the current supplied to the resonant circuit (the current ratio). This may be further compensated based on the amount of power supplied to the transmitter.