Industrial Plant Context Threat Scoring for Adaptive Anomaly Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional intrusion detection systems in industrial plants face challenges with false positives and negatives due to static threat scoring and lack of dynamic adjustment to changes in the threat landscape, leading to ineffective continuous risk management.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that determines a context threat score by integrating various context factors, including time, historical data, user activities, and system health, using a weighted analysis and machine learning models to adaptively evaluate anomalies and provide a nuanced threat assessment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If traditional threat scoring mechanisms are used to categorize threats into predefined levels, then the system provides a simple classification approach, but it results in high false alarm rates and fails to identify actual threats due to static scoring criteria

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of threat classificationVSAvoidaccuracy of threat detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic threat scoring by continuously adjusting context factor weights based on changing threat landscapes and operational conditions. The system transitions from static predefined threat levels to dynamic contextual assessment, where scores are continuously updated based on real-time data from multiple context factors including environmental conditions, operational state, and threat intelligence, thereby improving detection accuracy while maintaining operational simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters of threat assessment by introducing multiple context factors (environmental, operational, security) with dynamically adjustable weights. Instead of using fixed threat categories, the system varies the importance of different parameters based on current conditions, allowing the same event to be scored differently depending on contextual parameters, thus reducing false alarms while preserving ease of use

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Stability of the object's composition

If static threat scores are provided without dynamic adjustment, then the system maintains consistent evaluation criteria, but it lacks effectiveness for continuous risk management as the threat landscape changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsistency of evaluation criteriaVSAvoidresponsiveness to threat landscape changes
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where threat scores are continuously refined based on outcomes and changing conditions. Context factor weights are adjusted dynamically based on feedback from threat intelligence updates, operational changes, and incident outcomes, allowing the evaluation criteria to adapt to the evolving threat landscape while maintaining a structured assessment framework through the consistent application of contextual parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms static threat scoring into a dynamic system where evaluation criteria adapt to changing conditions. The system maintains structural consistency through its multi-factor framework while dynamically adjusting the weight and relevance of different context factors based on current threat landscapes, operational states, and environmental conditions, enabling continuous risk management effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If context factor weights are dynamically adjusted based on threat intelligence updates and operational changes, then the system achieves adaptive threat assessment, but it increases system complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptive threat assessment capabilityVSAvoidcomplexity of scoring mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the threat assessment system into distinct context factors (environmental, operational, security) with specific weightings for each. This segmentation allows the complex adaptive assessment to be broken down into manageable components, where each factor can be independently monitored and adjusted, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining adaptive capability through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system manages complexity by changing parameters in a structured manner - adjusting the weights of predefined context factors based on threat intelligence and operational changes. Rather than creating entirely new assessment mechanisms, the system modifies parameters within an existing framework, enabling adaptive assessment while maintaining manageable complexity through consistent parameter adjustment protocols

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250317459A1Method and Device for Determining a Context Threat Score
Publication Date: 2025.10.09 ABB (SCHWEIZ) AG
  • US20250317459A1 patent drawing
  • US20250317459A1 patent drawing
  • US20250317459A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for determining a context threat score in an industrial plant includes obtaining input data from the industrial plant, the input data comprising environmental data and/or operational data of at least one section of the plant; determining a context factor score for the at least one section of the industrial plant based on at least one pre-determined context factor and the input data, wherein the at least one context factor comprises a relation between the input data and context data of the at least one section, wherein the context data comprises at least one context dependent property of the at least one section; and determining, by the processing unit, a context threat score based on the at least one context factor score.