Industrial Machine Power Control System for Peak Demand Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Industrial machines face challenges in balancing maximum efficiency and low power usage to minimize electricity costs, as multiple machines often peak power usage simultaneously, leading to increased overall power consumption and costs.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a power control system in industrial machines that monitors and communicates power usage with other machines to adapt operations and prevent overall power usage from exceeding peak thresholds, thereby reducing energy costs while maintaining efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If industrial machines operate at maximum efficiency to complete projects on time, then productivity is improved, but overall power usage increases and energy costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproject completion efficiencyVSAvoidoverall power usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The power control system continuously monitors power usage of multiple industrial machines and uses this feedback to dynamically adjust individual machine power consumption. When the aggregate power usage approaches the peak threshold, the system automatically reduces power consumption of individual machines, creating a closed-loop control system that balances productivity and energy costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the operating parameters of industrial machines based on real-time power usage conditions. Instead of static power limits, the control system adapts power allocation continuously, allowing machines to operate at higher power when aggregate usage is low and reducing power when approaching peak thresholds, thus optimizing both productivity and energy costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If multiple industrial machines operate independently at peak power levels, then individual machine efficiency is maximized, but aggregate power usage exceeds peak power threshold and increases energy costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindividual machine efficiencyVSAvoidaggregate peak power usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the power control functions of multiple independent industrial machines into a coordinated system. By combining power usage data from all machines and implementing centralized or distributed coordination, the system ensures that aggregate power usage remains within peak thresholds while maintaining individual machine productivity through compensatory power allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

Each machine's power control system receives feedback about the aggregate power usage of the entire system and adjusts its own power consumption accordingly. This feedback mechanism allows individual machines to operate efficiently while collectively maintaining power usage within acceptable limits, preventing simultaneous peak operation that would exceed the threshold.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of energy

If an operator of a single industrial machine tries to determine when to limit power usage, then energy costs can be reduced, but the operator cannot know when aggregate power usage is approaching peak threshold

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy cost reductionVSAvoidaggregate power usage information
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The power control system acts as an intermediary between individual machine operators and the aggregate power usage information. Instead of requiring operators to directly monitor and interpret complex system-wide power data, the control system automatically collects, processes, and acts on this information, providing a simplified interface that enables energy cost reduction without burdening operators with information management complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Power

If a power control system monitors and communicates power usage across multiple machines, then overall power usage can be managed to prevent peak threshold exceedance, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverall power usage managementVSAvoidpower control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The power control system implements self-service capabilities where each industrial machine autonomously monitors its own power usage, communicates with other machines, and adjusts its operation without requiring external intervention. This distributed self-service approach reduces the need for complex centralized control infrastructure while achieving effective aggregate power management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS9811144B2Industrial machine having a power control system
Publication Date: 2017.11.07 JOY GLOBAL SURFACE MINING INC
  • US9811144B2 patent drawing
  • US9811144B2 patent drawing
  • US9811144B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system includes a first industrial machine and a second industrial machine. The system also includes a power distribution system configured to provide power to the first industrial machine and the second industrial machine. The first industrial machine includes a first power control system configured to monitor power usage of the first industrial machine, and transmit power usage information of the first industrial machine to the second industrial machine. The second industrial machine includes a second power control system configured to monitor power usage of the second industrial machine, receive the power usage information from the first industrial machine, and control power usage of the second industrial machine based on the power usage information received from the first industrial machine.