Anomaly Detection in Industrial Machine Sensor Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing industrial machine monitoring systems fail to accurately detect anomalies in real-time, leading to unnecessary downtime and costs due to reliance on predetermined rules, periodic testing, and human error, and lack of comprehensive data analysis, resulting in missed or inaccurate failure determinations and inefficient maintenance processes.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that computes an average anomalous amount from sensory input data of industrial machines within a predetermined proximity, determining anomalies by subtracting this average from each data point and exceeding a threshold, using unsupervised machine learning and adaptive thresholds to identify and predict potential failures, and automatically generate corrective solutions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If predetermined rules and periodic testing are used for machine monitoring, then implementation complexity is reduced, but detection accuracy and reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring system complexityVSAvoidfailure detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-learning by automatically analyzing sensor data patterns and adapting its detection algorithms without human intervention. The machine learning models continuously improve their anomaly detection capabilities by processing new data, enabling the system to maintain high reliability while reducing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts monitoring parameters and detection thresholds based on learned patterns from sensor data. By continuously optimizing detection parameters through machine learning, the system achieves high accuracy without requiring complex predetermined rules, resolving the contradiction between simplicity and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If all sensor data is collected and analyzed comprehensively, then detection precision improves, but computing resource consumption and data processing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection precisionVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and focuses analysis on the most critical sensor data patterns and features that indicate anomalies. By identifying and prioritizing relevant data elements through machine learning, the system achieves high detection precision while reducing the volume of data requiring processing, thus lowering computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system divides sensor data into meaningful categories and time intervals, processing only the segments that show potential anomalies. This segmentation approach allows comprehensive analysis of critical data while avoiding unnecessary processing of normal operational data, reducing overall computational resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If human analysts manually monitor and interpret machine data, then adaptability to complex patterns improves, but response time and productivity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepattern recognition capabilityVSAvoidanomaly detection speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces human analysts with automated machine learning algorithms that continuously monitor sensor data. The AI models automatically recognize complex patterns and detect anomalies in real-time, providing both the adaptability of human expertise and the speed of automated processing, thus resolving the contradiction between adaptability and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where detected anomalies and their resolutions are fed back into the machine learning models. This feedback mechanism enables the system to continuously improve its pattern recognition capabilities while maintaining rapid response times, combining the adaptability of human analysts with automated processing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If maintenance is performed based on predicted failures, then production reliability improves, but unnecessary maintenance activities increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction reliabilityVSAvoidmaintenance resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of sensor data to predict potential failures before they occur. By identifying early signs of deterioration and scheduling maintenance in advance, the system prevents actual failures while avoiding unnecessary maintenance activities, thus improving production reliability without wasting resources on premature or unnecessary repairs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts maintenance scheduling based on real-time machine condition data and predicted failure probabilities. By making maintenance decisions adaptive rather than static, the system performs maintenance only when truly needed, optimizing the balance between production reliability and resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11933695B2System and method for detecting anomalies in sensory data of industrial machines located within a predetermined proximity
Publication Date: 2024.03.19 AB SKF SKF PATENT DEPARTMENT
  • US11933695B2 patent drawing
  • US11933695B2 patent drawing
  • US11933695B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and computer-implemented method for detecting anomalies in industrial machine sensor data, including: computing, based on a received suspected anomalous level value of a sensory input data of each of the a plurality of sensory input data of a plurality of industrial machines that are located within a predetermined proximity, an average anomalous amount that is associated with at least a time interval; and determining that at least one of the plurality of suspected anomalies is an anomaly when a result of a subtraction of the computed average anomalous amount from each suspected anomalous level value of the plurality of sensory input data exceeds a predetermined threshold.