Industrial Vehicle Touchscreen GUI With State-Based Screen Snapping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Industrial vehicles lack efficient and effective graphical user interfaces that can seamlessly integrate touch gesture commands and hardware controls, complicating operator interaction and data display in dynamic work environments.

Innovation Solution

A processing device with a touch screen display and a controller that detects gesture commands and maps them to hardware controls, allowing operators to navigate widgets representing live data, with automatic switching between motion and lift operation screens based on vehicle states, enabling efficient information display and retrieval.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a graphical user interface with touch screen display is implemented on industrial vehicles, then operator interaction and data display capability are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator interactionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller serves multiple functions by both processing gesture commands from the touch screen display and mapping them to hardware controls, while also monitoring vehicle operating states and automatically switching between motion and lift screens. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated components, thereby improving ease of operation without proportionally increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines the touch screen display interface with the vehicle's existing control system by integrating gesture command detection and hardware control mapping within the same controller. This merging allows seamless interaction between touch gestures and hardware controls, improving operator interaction while avoiding the complexity of completely separate systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Loss of information

If automatic switching between motion and lift screens is implemented based on vehicle states, then information accessibility is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation accessibilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors vehicle operating states (such as whether the vehicle is in motion or performing lift operations) and uses this feedback to automatically switch between motion-related and lift-related screen displays. This feedback mechanism ensures that the most relevant information is always accessible to the operator without manual intervention, improving information accessibility while keeping the switching logic integrated within the existing controller.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The graphical user interface is made dynamic by automatically adapting its content based on real-time vehicle operating states. The system transitions between different screen configurations (motion screen vs. lift screen) depending on whether the vehicle is moving or performing lifting operations, ensuring that operators always see context-relevant information without manual reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If gesture commands are mapped to hardware controls, then ease of operation is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller acts as an intermediary between the touch screen display and the vehicle's hardware controls. It receives gesture commands from the operator via the touch screen, interprets them, and maps them to the corresponding hardware control actions. This intermediary role enables intuitive touch-based operation while leveraging the existing hardware control infrastructure, improving ease of operation without requiring complete hardware replacement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a virtual copy of hardware controls in the form of gesture-based touch screen interfaces. Operators can interact with virtual representations of control functions through gestures, which are then translated into actual hardware control signals. This copying approach allows operators to use intuitive touch gestures while the underlying hardware control system remains unchanged, improving ease of operation without significant additional complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS11899871B2Processing device having a graphical user interface for industrial vehicle
Publication Date: 2024.02.13 CROWN EQUIP CORP
  • US11899871B2 patent drawing
  • US11899871B2 patent drawing
  • US11899871B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A processing device having a graphical user interface includes a touch screen display that receives touch gesture commands from a vehicle operator and a controller. In operation, computer code implements a set of widgets such that at least one widget is normally viewable on the touch screen display. The set of widgets are organized to include at least one home screen, such as a motion home screen that displays at least one travel related widget, a lift home screen that displays at least one lift related widget, etc. When a current operating state of a control module of the industrial vehicle indicates that a designated control is engaged, the controller causes the display to snap to the associated home screen position.