Inert Material Selection for Propylene Oxidation Reactors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing methods for determining the inertness of materials in the vapor phase oxidation of propylene to acrolein and acrylic acid are inadequate, as they do not effectively assess the formation of high boiling point byproducts, leading to increased pressure drop and reduced production efficiency due to the accumulation of heavy byproducts in the reactor catalyst bed.

Innovation Solution

A process is developed to determine the inertness of materials by analyzing the ratio of phthalic acid to acrolein and acrylic acid in a gaseous mixture passed through a fixed bed reactor containing the inert material, with specific conditions of temperature, pressure, and contact time, allowing for the selection of materials with lower phthalic acid formation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If inert materials are used in the catalyst bed to reduce peak temperature, then thermal stability is improved, but pressure drop increases due to accumulation of heavy by-products

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepeak temperatureVSAvoidpressure drop
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the parameter used to evaluate inert material performance from general chemical inertness to a specific metric (PTAinert ratio) that measures phthalic acid formation. This parameter change enables selection of inert materials that maintain thermal stability while minimizing heavy by-product formation and associated pressure drop.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces mechanical evaluation methods (physical inspection, generic chemical tests) with a chemical analysis method that measures phthalic acid formation. This substitution provides a more accurate and predictive measure of inert material performance in preventing pressure drop.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If the reactor operates for extended periods to maintain production rate, then productivity is improved, but pressure drop increases leading to shutdowns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction rateVSAvoidoperational continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention enables preliminary selection of inert materials with low PTAinert ratios before they are installed in the reactor. This preliminary action prevents future pressure drop problems and unscheduled shutdowns, ensuring both high productivity and operational continuity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention establishes a feedback mechanism where the PTAinert ratio serves as a predictive indicator of inert material performance. By monitoring and selecting materials based on this ratio, operators can predict and prevent pressure drop issues before they affect productivity and operational continuity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of manufacture

If existing inertness determination methods are used, then material selection is simplified, but heavy by-product formation is not effectively assessed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial selectionVSAvoidinertness assessment
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the assessment parameter from general inertness to the specific PTAinert ratio that directly measures phthalic acid formation. This parameter change maintains ease of material selection through a standardized test while dramatically improving measurement precision for predicting heavy by-product formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enables the identification of inert materials that minimize the formation of heavy byproducts, thereby reducing pressure drop and maintaining high production efficiency by selecting materials with the lowest PTAinert ratio, thus preventing unscheduled reactor shutdowns and maintaining economical production rates.

Implementation Method 1

vapor phase oxidation of propylene to acrolein and acrylic acid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVapor phase oxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 2

selectively condensing components of P2 having a boiling point at a pressure of 1 atm of at least 20° C.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCondensation: Condensation

Implementation Method 3

feeding P1 in the vapor phase at a pressure of from 1 to 1.5 atm to a fixed bed reactor tube containing the inert material having a bed temperature of from 200 to 450° C.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reaction: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentUS10968158B2Method of determining the inertness of materials for use in monomer production
Publication Date: 2021.04.06 ROHM & HAAS CO

AI summary

A method of determining the inertness of a material regarding the formation of heavy by-products during the reaction of propylene to acrolein and acrylic acid.