Inertia-Based Safety Switch Locking Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Safety switches with locking mechanisms can be temporarily disengaged by sudden physical shocks, allowing unauthorized access to machinery despite power being cut off, as the time-delayed unlocking mechanism is circumvented.

Innovation Solution

A safety switch design featuring a solenoid, a solenoid plunger, and a locking member that utilizes differences in inertia to inhibit disengagement of the rod-locking element from the rod, preventing unauthorized removal of the actuator by incorporating a plate-locking member that secures the rod locking members when subjected to specific impacts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a locking mechanism is provided to prevent actuator removal, then security is improved, but the mechanism can be temporarily disengaged by sudden physical shocks

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidtemporary disengagement by shock
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The locking member is designed to dynamically respond to applied forces through inertia-based movement. When force is applied to the housing, the locking member moves relative to the rod-locking element due to the difference in inertia between the two components, allowing the locking mechanism to adapt its state based on the dynamic conditions rather than remaining static

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention converts the harmful effect of sudden physical shocks into a beneficial security feature. By designing the locking member with specific inertia characteristics, normal operational shocks are converted into activation of the locking mechanism, while only sufficiently strong intentional attacks can overcome the inertia-based protection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

2Reliability

If the locking mechanism is made robust to prevent shock disengagement, then security is improved, but the mechanism may become overly complex

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidlocking mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is designed to be self-activating based on the physical principles of inertia. The locking member automatically engages or disengages the rod-locking element in response to applied forces without requiring external control systems, sensors, or complex control logic, thereby maintaining simplicity while achieving robust security

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces complex electronic or mechanical control systems with a purely inertial mechanical principle. The difference in inertia between the locking member and housing directly controls the locking state, eliminating the need for sensors, microcontrollers, or complex mechanical linkages that would increase device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances security by ensuring the actuator cannot be removed unless the solenoid is energized, preventing premature disengagement and maintaining power cutoff until authorized, thus preventing accidental or unauthorized access to machinery.

Implementation Method 1

The locking member is moveable relative to the housing in response to a difference in inertia between the locking member and the housing when a force is applied to the housing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertia: Inertia

Implementation Method 2

A solenoid is fixed in position relative to the housing and a solenoid plunger slideably is mounted in the solenoid. The solenoid plunger is connected to the rod-locking element and is arranged such that moving the solenoid plunger relative to the solenoid actuates the rod-locking element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolenoid: Solenoid

Data Source

PatentUS7724112B2Safety switch
Publication Date: 2010.05.25 ROCKWELL AUTOMATION LTD
  • US7724112B2 patent drawing
  • US7724112B2 patent drawing
  • US7724112B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A safety switch that includes a locking mechanism having a rod locking element that is located adjacent to a rod and engageable with the rod to lock the rod in position relative to a housing. The safety switch locking mechanism includes a locking member that is moveable relative to the housing in response to a difference in inertia between the locking member and the housing when a force is applied to the housing. The locking member is arranged to inhibit disengagement of the rod-locking element from the rod when the force is applied to the housing.