Inertial Gesture Control Using Torso Reference Motion Isolation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing motion-induced control systems for unmanned vehicles face challenges in accurately distinguishing between intended commands and motion-induced errors, particularly when the operator is in motion or on a vehicle, leading to potential interference with vehicle control.

Innovation Solution

A motion identification system that uses inertial sensors to compare motion data from a controller and an operator's torso to determine if the hand and body are moving in sync, thereby distinguishing between intended commands and motion-induced errors, and adjusts commands accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If motion-induced control systems are used to enable hands-free operation, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to false commands when operator moves

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehands-free operation capabilityVSAvoidcontrol accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a torso-mounted inertial sensor as an intermediary reference device to mediate between the controller's motion detection and the actual operator intent. This intermediary sensor provides a stable reference frame that filters out false motion signals caused by operator movement, allowing the system to maintain hands-free operation capability while improving control reliability by distinguishing between intentional hand gestures and unintentional body movements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If inertial sensors are used to detect hand movements, then productivity is improved through faster control response, but measurement precision deteriorates when operator is moving

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol response speedVSAvoidhand movement detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the torso-mounted inertial sensor continuously monitors operator body motion and feeds this information back to the control system. This feedback loop allows the system to dynamically adjust the interpretation of controller motion data, maintaining high measurement precision for hand gestures even when the operator is moving, while preserving the fast response characteristics of inertial sensing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If motion-induced commands are used for vehicle control, then ease of operation is improved, but loss of information increases due to inability to distinguish intended commands from errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegesture-based controlVSAvoidcommand intent differentiation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the motion detection function into two independent components: a controller-mounted sensor for detecting hand gestures and a torso-mounted sensor for detecting body motion. This segmentation allows the system to separately analyze and differentiate between intentional hand movements and unintentional body movements, reducing information loss by accurately determining command intent while maintaining ease of gesture-based operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This system effectively reduces errors by accurately differentiating between intended vehicle commands and motion-induced errors, ensuring stable and reliable control of unmanned vehicles even during operator movement.

Implementation Method 1

these methods and systems may determine, using motion data from inertial sensors, whether the hand/arm of the operator is moving in the same motion as the body of the operator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertial sensing: Accelerometer

Data Source

PatentUS11675445B1Inertially isolated spatial control
Publication Date: 2023.06.13 TOMAHAWK ROBOTICS INC
  • US11675445B1 patent drawing
  • US11675445B1 patent drawing
  • US11675445B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems are described herein for detecting motion-induced errors received from inertial-type input devices and for generating accurate vehicle control commands that account for operator movement. These methods and systems may determine, using motion data from inertial sensors, whether the hand/arm of the operator is moving in the same motion as the body of the operator, and if both are moving in the same way, these systems and methods may determine that the motion is not intended to be a motion-induced command. However, if the hand/arm of the operator is moving in a different motion from the body of the operator, these methods and systems may determine that the operator intended the motion to be a motion-induced command to a vehicle.