Inertial Motion Control for Mechanical Display Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing timepiece correction mechanisms, particularly in mechanical and digital watches, lack intuitive and efficient methods for adjusting display parameters, often requiring repetitive and jerky movements due to constant correction speeds and lack of acceleration or deceleration phases, leading to inconvenient user experience.

Innovation Solution

A coupling device that transforms the rotational speed of a control member, such as a crown, into non-proportional angular speeds of display hands using a microcontroller and Newtonian equations to simulate inertia, allowing for continuous and fluid movement with variable speed control, enabling simultaneous adjustment of multiple display parameters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If constant correction speed is used in digital timepieces, then the adjustment process becomes predictable and simple to control, but the movement becomes jerky and requires repetitive user input

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol simplicityVSAvoidjerky movement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transitioning from constant correction speed to variable correction speed. The system dynamically adjusts the scrolling speed based on the duration of crown actuation - longer actuation produces faster scrolling, while shorter actuation produces slower scrolling. This dynamic speed adjustment eliminates jerky movements and creates fluid, natural hand motion during time setting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the speed parameter dynamically during the correction process. Instead of maintaining a fixed correction speed, the system varies the scrolling speed as a function of actuation duration, allowing the parameter to adapt during operation. This resolves the contradiction by enabling both smooth motion and simple control through intuitive crown manipulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If prolonged activation of control member is used to achieve fine adjustment, then the correction precision is improved, but the adjustment time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrection precisionVSAvoidadjustment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts correction speed based on actuation characteristics. Users can achieve fine adjustment precision quickly by using brief, controlled crown actuations that trigger slow scrolling only when needed, rather than requiring prolonged continuous actuation. This dynamic response optimizes both precision and time efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs periodic sampling of crown position to determine correction speed. Rather than continuous monitoring, the system periodically evaluates actuation duration and adjusts scrolling speed accordingly. This allows fine precision adjustments to be achieved through short, periodic user inputs rather than continuous prolonged actuation, significantly reducing adjustment time while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Ease of operation

If mechanical crown actuation is used for time setting, then the user interface is intuitive and familiar, but the correction speed cannot be varied continuously

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterface intuitivenessVSAvoidspeed variability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the purely mechanical crown-to-hand connection with an electronic sensing and control system. Sensors detect crown actuation characteristics, and electronic circuits process this information to generate variable correction speeds. This substitution maintains the intuitive mechanical interface while enabling continuous speed variability that would be impossible with purely mechanical gear trains.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary electronic control system between the mechanical crown and the display hands. This intermediary layer senses crown actuation, processes the signal duration and intensity, and translates it into appropriate correction speeds. This mediator enables the mechanical interface to control variable-speed electronic correction, combining the best of both mechanical intuitiveness and electronic versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If rapid correction is implemented without acceleration or deceleration phases, then the adjustment speed is improved, but the movement appears abrupt and lacks fluidity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrection speedVSAvoidabrupt movement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically controls correction speed with acceleration and deceleration phases. When the crown is actuated, the hands accelerate smoothly rather than jumping instantly. When actuation stops, the hands decelerate gradually rather than stopping abruptly. This dynamic speed control maintains high correction productivity while eliminating abrupt movements through programmed acceleration and deceleration profiles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a faster, more intuitive, and efficient adjustment process with minimal user input, ensuring smooth and continuous movement of display hands, reducing jerky movements and allowing simultaneous adjustment of multiple parameters, thus enhancing user experience.

Implementation Method 1

a sensor (4) making it possible to characterise the movement of the activation means (1)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSensor detection:

Implementation Method 2

an electronic circuit (31) having a processing unit (5) and a motor control circuit (6)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic conversion:

Implementation Method 3

The coupling device creates a relationship of interdependence for the mutual functioning of these parts; it is thus possible to generate the movement of a part, unilaterally or bilaterally from that of the other

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertia simulation: Inertia

Data Source

PatentEP2466400B1Inertia movement of a mechanical display member
Publication Date: 2019.01.16 THE SWATCH GRP RES & DEVELONMENT LTD
  • EP2466400B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP2466400B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~3
  • EP2466400B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The device (3) has an electronic circuit (31) for simulating and controlling an inertial motion of mechanical display units (2), where the device applies variable velocity of motion to the display units in response to activation of an activation unit (1), and generates inertial motion of the display units. A motor (61) drives the display units and defines a maximum velocity of motion for the display units. A sensor (4) detects impulse frequency (401), where acceleration and/or deceleration of the activation unit are calculated according to the frequency. An independent claim is also included for a method for adjusting display parameters visualized using mechanical display units.