Inertizing Heavy Metals via Low-Temperature CO2 Calcination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for treating heavy metals, chlorides, and soluble solids in waste from thermal processes are costly and energy-intensive, with high demands on process management and exhaust gas cleaning, and often result in further contamination due to the solubility of these substances in landfill environments.

Innovation Solution

A thermal process involving calcination, preceded by wet-chemical treatment and granulation if necessary, using warm flue gas with a high CO2 content to stabilize heavy metals and chlorides by forming inert carbonates, reducing solubility and moisture content to minimize disposal costs and environmental impact.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If high temperatures over 900°C are used for sintering fly ash with pure coal dust, then heavy metals are effectively stabilized, but energy consumption increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheavy metal stabilizationVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the temperature parameter from conventional high temperatures (>900°C) to moderate temperatures (200-500°C) and uses carbon dioxide from flue gas instead of pure coal dust, achieving effective heavy metal stabilization through carbonate formation at lower energy input

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces carbon dioxide from flue gas as an intermediary substance to facilitate carbonate formation for heavy metal stabilization, replacing the need for pure coal dust and high temperature conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If reducing agents such as carbon monoxide, hydrogen, natural gas, petroleum, coal are added to remove heavy metals as oxides, then heavy metal separation is achieved, but process complexity and exhaust gas cleaning costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheavy metal separationVSAvoidprocess management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of removing heavy metals through reduction and separation as in conventional processes, the patent inverts the approach by directly stabilizing heavy metals in situ through carbonate formation, eliminating the need for complex reduction-exoxidation cycles and extensive exhaust gas cleaning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and utilizes carbon dioxide from the flue gas stream, converting it into a useful reagent for heavy metal stabilization, thereby simplifying the overall process by eliminating the need for external reducing agents and complex separation systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If fine-grained aluminosilicates such as clays, kaolin are added to form a solid matrix during calcination, then heavy metals are separated through volatile chloride formation, but energy costs and exhaust gas cleaning requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheavy metal separationVSAvoidcalcination energy cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the calcination temperature from conventional high temperatures (700°C and above) to moderate temperatures (200-500°C), achieving effective heavy metal stabilization through carbonate formation without requiring energy-intensive high-temperature calcination or addition of fine-grained aluminosilicates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of operation

If waste with high moisture content is directly processed, then processing simplicity is maintained, but mass transfer efficiency and disposal costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing simplicityVSAvoidmass transfer efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary drying of the waste material before carbonation treatment, removing excess moisture to optimize mass transfer efficiency and reduce disposal costs, while maintaining operational simplicity through a straightforward preprocessing step

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively stabilizes and inertizes heavy metals and chlorides, reducing their solubility and disposal costs by converting them into low-reactivity carbonates, while optimizing energy use and minimizing mechanical stress on granules during calcination, thus enhancing the safety and efficiency of waste handling and disposal.

Implementation Method 1

inerting heavy metals such as hexavalent chromium, chlorides and other salt formers, as well as soluble solids and metallic contamination in ashes and/or waste from incineration processes or other thermal, chemical, mechanical processes by means of carbonation reactions to form acid- and heat-resistant matrix components

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCarbonation reaction: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

calcination, preceded by wet-chemical treatment and granulation if necessary, using warm flue gas with a high CO2 content to stabilize heavy metals and chlorides

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal heating: Heating

Data Source

PatentEP2650391B1Method for the inertisation of heavy metals such as hexavalent chromium, chlorides and other salt-forming compounds and soluble solids and metallic contaminations
Publication Date: 2018.02.14 ANDRITZ AG
  • EP2650391B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2650391B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2650391B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The method comprises carbonating inorganic matrix components and then performing combustion or thermal, chemical and/or mechanical calcination process using a hot flue gas having carbon dioxide as a heating medium, adjusting temperature of the hot flue gas to 200-500[deg] C, adding additives to waste/ash in the matrix components to thermally decompose to urea and carbonates during calcination process and to release carbon dioxide, and performing wet chemical treatment and granulation with respect to the optimum mass transfer at a high carbonation speed before the calcination. The method comprises carbonating inorganic matrix components and then performing combustion or thermal, chemical and/or mechanical calcination process using a hot flue gas having carbon dioxide as a heating medium, adjusting temperature of the hot flue gas to 200-500[deg] C, adding additives to waste/ash in the matrix components to thermally decompose to urea and carbonates during calcination process and to release carbon dioxide, and performing wet chemical treatment and granulation with respect to the optimum mass transfer at a high carbonation speed before the calcination. A degree of carbonization of product is oriented from calcination at the optimum of the lowest solubility of contaminants using heavy metals including hexavalent chromium, chlorides and other salt-forming agents, soluble solids and metallic contaminants, and a pH is 8-12.