Infant Carrier Seat Segmentation for Adjustable Width and Support

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional soft-sided infant carriers have a fixed seat portion, which limits adaptability as infants grow, and are not easily convertible between front and rear carry configurations, making them uncomfortable and less functional.

Innovation Solution

An adjustable infant carrier with a selectively expandable seat portion and a deployable sling seat, featuring slider buckles, adjustment arrangements, and securing mechanisms that allow for varying degrees of width adjustment and support, enabling use in multiple carry configurations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the seat portion of the carrier is made fixed in size, then the structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but the carrier cannot accommodate infants of different sizes or stages of growth

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different infant sizesVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The seat portion is divided into multiple adjustable sections with different width configurations. The side sections can be positioned in different locations along the waist belt to create variable seat widths, allowing the carrier to adapt to infants of different sizes without requiring multiple separate carriers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The seat portion transitions from a fixed structure to a dynamic, adjustable structure. The side sections can be moved along the waist belt and secured at different positions, enabling the carrier to change its configuration to match the growing needs of the infant.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If the seat portion is designed for a larger infant, then it can accommodate growth, but it becomes too big and provides insufficient support for younger infants

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccommodation of growing infantsVSAvoidcomfort and support for young infants
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The seat is segmented into adjustable sections that can be configured to provide different levels of support. For younger infants, the side sections can be positioned to create a narrower, more supportive configuration that keeps the infant closer to the caregiver's body.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different sections of the seat can be configured with different properties. The central portion provides consistent support while the side sections can be adjusted to modify the local width and support characteristics to match the infant's age and size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If the carrier uses a fixed seat configuration, then the manufacturing process is simple, but the carrier cannot be easily converted between front and rear carry configurations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconvertibility between carry configurationsVSAvoidadjustment mechanisms
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The seat portion is designed with dynamic adjustability that enables conversion between front and rear carry configurations. The side sections can be repositioned along the waist belt to accommodate different carrying positions, and the adjustable nature allows the same structure to serve multiple functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The adjustable seat mechanism serves multiple functions: it accommodates different infant sizes, enables conversion between front and rear carry configurations, and provides comfort for both the caregiver and infant. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate carriers for different purposes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Adaptability or versatility

If the seat portion is made adjustable with multiple configurations, then it accommodates different infant sizes and configurations, but the structure becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevarying width and support configurationsVSAvoidnumber of adjustment components
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The seat is divided into modular sections that can be independently adjusted. This segmentation allows for variability in configuration while using standardized components that can be positioned in different locations to achieve different seat widths and support levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10441091B2Ergonomic outfacing carrier
Publication Date: 2019.10.15 BLUE BOX TOY FACTORY
  • US10441091B2 patent drawing
  • US10441091B2 patent drawing
  • US10441091B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An adjustable infant carrier which is outfitted with various modalities, including a selectively expandable and retractable seat portion and a selectively deployable sling seat, as allows for varying degrees of adjustability to the effective width of and support level provided by the seat portion of the carrier alone or in combination with the seat sling thereof.