Infant Sleep Enclosure with Auto-Return Wall and Latch for Safe Access

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional bassinets with rigid walls provide secure enclosures but hinder access, and existing solutions with movable walls risk accidental lowering, potentially allowing babies to roll out.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus with an upstanding enclosure featuring a moveable front wall biased to return automatically to a secure upper position, equipped with a latch mechanism that is manually releasable for access, combining fail-safe operation with easy one-handed use.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a rigid wall surrounds the floor portion, then the baby is securely contained, but access to the baby is impeded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecure containmentVSAvoidaccess to baby
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The front wall is made movable between an upper position (preventing baby from rolling out) and a lower position (allowing easier access). This dynamic structure resolves the contradiction by allowing the wall to adapt its state based on whether security or access is the primary need.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The front wall is divided into multiple segments that can move independently. The upper portion can be lowered to provide access while the lower portion remains in place, allowing partial access while maintaining some containment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If the front wall is made movable to improve access, then easier access is achieved, but the risk of accidental lowering increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess to babyVSAvoidprevention of accidental lowering
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A latch mechanism is provided that can be engaged before the wall is lowered. This preliminary action (engaging the latch) prevents accidental lowering while allowing intentional lowering when the latch is deliberately disengaged.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The biasing mechanism applies a preliminary counter-force to prevent the wall from moving downward accidentally. This anti-action (upward biasing force) counteracts any unintended downward movement while allowing controlled movement when the latch is released.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Ease of operation

If a biasing mechanism is used to automatically return the front wall to the upper position, then ease of operation is improved, but the risk of unintended activation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic return to upper positionVSAvoidprevention of unintended activation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The latch mechanism is engaged in advance to lock the front wall in the lower position before the biasing mechanism can accidentally activate it. This preliminary engagement prevents unintended activation while allowing the biasing mechanism to function when the latch is deliberately released.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The latch mechanism acts as a protective measure in advance, cushioning against the potential harm of unintended biasing mechanism activation. By having the latch engaged beforehand, the system prevents accidental activation while maintaining the ease of automatic return function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

4Ease of operation

If the front wall is lowered frequently for access, then ease of operation is improved, but the structural integrity and security may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency of accessVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The front wall is designed as a dynamic structure that can be lowered and raised repeatedly without compromising structural integrity. The wall includes reinforcement elements and is constructed from materials that maintain strength despite frequent movement cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The latch mechanism is engaged in advance to secure the wall in the lower position during access operations. This preliminary engagement distributes forces evenly and prevents sudden movements that could compromise structural integrity during frequent access operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Ensures secure containment while allowing easy access to the baby, reducing the risk of accidental lowering and enhancing operational convenience for tired mothers, with robust and secure design features.

Implementation Method 1

A prior-art bassinet illustrating one approach to improve access to the baby is described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,962,012 B1. In this bassinet, a front wall portion (the portion of the wall closest to the mother in use) is movable between upper and lower positions and is biased (for example by a resilient spring) towards the upper position.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS11617452B2Sleep apparatus for infants and method
Publication Date: 2023.04.04 HALO DREAM INC
  • US11617452B2 patent drawing
  • US11617452B2 patent drawing
  • US11617452B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A sleep apparatus for an infant comprises an upstanding enclosure surrounding a sleeping platform. The enclosure has front and rear walls, the front wall being moveable between an upper position for preventing the infant from rolling off the sleeping platform and a lower position allowing access to the infant. A biasing mechanism biases the front wall to return automatically in to the upper position in the absence of a barrier to upward movement, and a latch automatically engages when the front wall is in its upper position. The latch prevents movement of the front wall from the upper position towards the lower position until and unless the latch is released.