Inference Model Generalization in Distributed Data Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In large distributed environments, managing the distribution of inference models across numerous data collectors leads to excessive computational overhead and inaccurate predictions due to the need for individual models, while also increasing communication bandwidth and power consumption through frequent data transmissions.

Innovation Solution

A system that uses a data aggregator to create a similarity graph, group nodes based on data similarity, and train inference models for groups of nodes rather than individual nodes, reducing the number of models needed and optimizing data transmission by discarding edges with low similarity thresholds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If individual inference models are trained for each data collector, then prediction accuracy is improved, but computational overhead and device complexity increase excessively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidcomputational overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple individual inference models into a single centralized inference model that processes data from all data collectors. This consolidation maintains prediction accuracy by using aggregated training data from all collectors while significantly reducing computational overhead and device complexity at individual nodes, as the heavy inference computation is centralized rather than distributed across all devices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the inference process into two distinct phases: training and execution. The training phase is centralized at the server where a single model is trained on aggregated data from all collectors, while the execution phase distributes lightweight model inference to individual data collectors. This segmentation allows accurate predictions without requiring each collector to maintain a full individual model

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If individual inference models are distributed to each data collector, then local prediction capability is improved, but communication bandwidth and power consumption increase due to frequent data transmissions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocal prediction capabilityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the training function centrally while keeping inference capability distributed. A single centralized model is trained on aggregated data from all collectors, then this unified model is distributed to collectors for local inference. This approach maintains local prediction capability while reducing power consumption by eliminating the need for each collector to independently train and update its own model, thereby reducing communication frequency and energy expenditure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Adaptability or versatility

If individual inference models are used for each data collector, then model specificity is improved, but the number of models and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel specificityVSAvoidnumber of models
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple individual models into a single centralized inference model that serves all data collectors. This unified model is trained on aggregated data from all collectors, providing specificity through comprehensive training data while reducing the total number of models from N individual models to just one centralized model, thereby decreasing system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Measurement precision

If all data is transmitted frequently for model training, then model accuracy is improved, but communication bandwidth consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoidcommunication bandwidth consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and centralizes the data aggregation and model training functions at the server, removing the need for frequent bidirectional data transmissions between collectors and individual model updates. Raw data is transmitted once to the server for centralized training, and only the final trained model parameters are distributed back, significantly reducing communication bandwidth consumption while maintaining model accuracy through comprehensive training data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20230342216A1System and method for inference model generalization for a distributed environment
Publication Date: 2023.10.26 DELL PROD LP
  • US20230342216A1 patent drawing
  • US20230342216A1 patent drawing
  • US20230342216A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for managing generalization of inference models throughout a distributed environment are disclosed. To manage generalization of inference models, a system may include a data aggregator and one or more data collectors. The data aggregator may obtain a similarity graph in order to determine the relationship between data obtained by one or more data collectors. The similarity graph may be used to obtain grouping for the data collectors. The data aggregator may train inference models to facilitate data collection by the data collectors included in the grouping.