Inflatable Infant Nest Structure for Faster Inflation and Support

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing infant accommodation apparatus, particularly those with inflatable annular bodies, face issues such as high production costs, lengthy inflation times, inadequate lateral support, and weak frame structures that can collapse, along with limited stimulation options.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a resilient, inflatable support device with a non-circular, curved enclosure wall and a self-supporting frame that includes a removable fabric cover and a tripod framework for easy assembly and stability, allowing for adjustable stimulation means like toys and electronic devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If an inflatable annular body is used to accommodate an infant, then the apparatus provides a simple structure, but it has a large volume which is costly to produce and takes a relatively long time to inflate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure simplicityVSAvoidinflation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The enclosure wall is divided into multiple regions with different radii of curvature (first, second, third, fourth, fifth, and sixth regions), creating a non-circular segmented structure that reduces overall volume while maintaining infant accommodation functionality. This segmentation allows faster inflation compared to a large annular body.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the geometric parameters of the enclosure from a uniform large annular shape to a non-circular configuration with varying radii of curvature in different regions. This parameter change reduces the volume requiring inflation while preserving the essential accommodation function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If an inflatable annular body is used, then the structure is simple, but it provides little lateral support for the infant

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure simplicityVSAvoidlateral support
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

Different regions of the enclosure wall are designed with different radii of curvature to provide localized functionality. Specifically, certain regions have smaller radii of curvature to provide enhanced lateral support at key positions, while other regions maintain larger radii for comfort and accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The enclosure transitions from a symmetric annular shape to an asymmetric non-circular configuration with varying curvature radii across different regions, enabling differentiated support characteristics in various方位 to better accommodate infant positioning and movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Adaptability or versatility

If a frame means is added to provide support and stimulation, then the infant accommodation is enhanced, but the frame is difficult to assemble and relatively weak with risk of collapse

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestimulation capabilityVSAvoidassembly difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The frame means is extracted as a separate, removable component from the main enclosure structure. This allows the frame to be independently manufactured and assembled, simplifying the overall manufacturing process while maintaining the stimulation functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The frame means is designed to be pre-assembled or pre-configured with stimulation elements before being attached to the enclosure, reducing assembly complexity during final installation and ensuring proper configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Adaptability or versatility

If a frame means is added for stimulation, then the infant engagement is improved, but the frame structure is relatively weak and may collapse

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestimulation capabilityVSAvoidstructural stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The frame means is merged with the enclosure wall through secure attachment at multiple positions, combining the structural integrity of the enclosure with the stimulation functionality of the frame. This integration ensures that the frame benefits from the enclosure's structural support while maintaining its stimulation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution reduces material costs, simplifies inflation, provides enhanced lateral support for infants, ensures structural stability, and allows for versatile stimulation options, creating a safe and engaging environment.

Implementation Method 1

said inner enclosure wall is defined by means of an inflated member which inflated member can preferably be deflated

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInflation:

Data Source

PatentUS8328594B2Infant accomodation apparatus
Publication Date: 2012.12.11 JAMES GALT
  • US8328594B2 patent drawing
  • US8328594B2 patent drawing
  • US8328594B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Infant accommodation apparatus supported in normal use on a flat horizontal surface. The apparatus includes a support device having, in a vertical plane, a constant circular or oval-shaped cross-section along its extent. The support device has an inner enclosure wall which is an inwardly facing upstanding enclosure wall which defines an infant accommodation region in which an infant may be positioned in use. The inner enclosure wall is endless and defines an endless non-circular enclosure around the infant accommodation region. The maximum diameter of the infant accommodation region is in the range 20 to 50cm, and the inner enclosure wall includes, when viewed from above, three curved apex regions separated by curved side regions. The support device further includes an outer enclosure wall which is an outwardly facing upstanding enclosure wall. The outer enclosure wall, when viewed from above, is non-circular and symmetrical about each of three vertical planes angled at 120° to each other.