Inflatable Interbody Fusion Device for Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current interbody fusion devices for spinal surgery require large incisions and significant neurovascular manipulation, leading to complications and prolonged recovery times, as they are not designed for minimally invasive endoscopic procedures.

Innovation Solution

An endoscopically implantable inflatable interbody fusion device with inflatable chambers that can be insufflated with a hardenable material, allowing for deployment through small incisions and customization to fit the vertebral anatomy, providing stability and facilitating bony fusion without the need for extensive surgical dissection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If traditional interbody fusion devices are used, then stable fusion and structural support are achieved, but large incisions and significant neurovascular manipulation are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoidsurgical access
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The device is divided into multiple segments including an outer wall, inner walls defining chambers, and separate inflation lumens. This segmentation allows the device to be inserted in a collapsed state through small incisions and then expanded to provide structural support, resolving the contradiction between ease of insertion and structural strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The device transitions from a static collapsed state during insertion to a dynamic expanded state providing structural support. The inflatable chambers allow the device to change volume and shape, enabling minimally invasive insertion while achieving the structural integrity needed for fusion support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If traditional interbody fusion devices are used, then fusion stability is achieved, but prolonged recovery time and tissue disruption occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefusion stabilityVSAvoidrecovery time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The device replaces traditional mechanical insertion methods with pneumatic inflation. Instead of forcing a rigid device through large incisions, the device is inflated after insertion, reducing surgical trauma and enabling faster patient recovery while maintaining fusion stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If the device is designed for endoscopic implantation, then minimally invasive surgery is achieved, but the device must be collapsible and inflatable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveminimally invasive insertionVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device employs flexible membranes including an outer wall and inner walls that can be collapsed for insertion and inflated for function. These thin-walled structures enable endoscopic implantation while maintaining the structural capacity to provide fusion support when expanded.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

4Adaptability or versatility

If the device includes multiple chambers and delivery tubes, then customization and anatomical fit are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanatomical fitVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device features multiple chambers with different configurations and delivery tubes positioned at specific locations to address local anatomical variations. Each chamber and tube is strategically positioned to provide customized fit for different spinal anatomies, enhancing adaptability while managing complexity through functional specialization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables true minimally invasive spinal fusion surgeries by allowing the device to be implanted through small incisions, reducing tissue disruption, pain, and hospital stay duration, while enhancing stability and fusion success through precise anatomical fit and bony ingrowth.

Implementation Method 1

The device includes a plurality of inflatable chambers defined by an outer wall and an inner wall

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInflation: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 2

insufflated with a hardenable material that sets to provide stability and promote bony fusion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase change: Phase Change

Data Source

PatentUS11213402B2Endoscopically implantable inflatable interbody fusion device
Publication Date: 2022.01.04 SUDDABY LOUBERT S
  • US11213402B2 patent drawing
  • US11213402B2 patent drawing
  • US11213402B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An endoscopically implantable inflatable interbody fusion device, including an inflatable body having a first inner wall and an outer wall, a first cavity defined by the first inner wall, at least one hollow space between the first inner wall and the outer wall, a first delivery tube extending from outside the outer wall into the at least one hollow space, and a second delivery tube extending from outside the outer wall, through the at least one hollow space, and terminating in the first cavity.