Motion-Activated Inflatable Wildlife Deterrent System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods to prevent wildlife damage, such as plastic snakes and flashing lights, are ineffective as wildlife becomes accustomed to these devices, leading to continued property damage from animals like deer, coyotes, and birds.

Innovation Solution

A wildlife damage prevention system featuring an inflatable deterrence unit and separate sensor devices that detect wildlife presence, transmitting signals to activate the inflatable device and a blower or light to scare away animals, providing adjustable timing and flexible placement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional wildlife deterrent devices (plastic snakes, flashing lights) are deployed, then initial wildlife avoidance is achieved, but wildlife becomes accustomed to the devices over time, reducing effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeterrence effectivenessVSAvoidduration of wildlife avoidance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs motion-activated inflatables that dynamically change state based on wildlife presence. The system transitions from a static inflatable to a dynamic one that inflates and deflates in response to sensor detection, creating unpredictable movement patterns that prevent wildlife habituation. This dynamic response maintains deterrence effectiveness over extended periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates sensors that continuously monitor the environment and provide feedback to the control system. When wildlife is detected, the sensor triggers the inflatable to activate, creating a feedback loop that responds to wildlife behavior in real-time. This adaptive feedback mechanism ensures the deterrent remains effective by adjusting its behavior based on actual wildlife presence and response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If sensor devices are integrated into the base unit, then system integration is simplified, but device complexity increases and placement flexibility is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem integration complexityVSAvoidplacement flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the system into separate functional modules: sensor devices, base unit, and inflatable components. The sensors are positioned independently at optimal detection locations, while the base unit houses the control electronics and power supply. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific function and enables flexible placement configurations to suit different terrains and environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The base unit serves as an intermediary component that receives signals from separate sensor devices and processes them to control the inflatable. This intermediary architecture allows sensors to be placed remotely from the control system, maintaining system flexibility while managing complexity through a clear signal processing hierarchy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If continuous operation of deterrent devices is implemented, then wildlife avoidance is maintained, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsistent wildlife avoidanceVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs periodic, intermittent operation rather than continuous operation. The inflatable activates only when sensors detect wildlife presence, creating a start-stop operation pattern. This periodic action maintains effective wildlife avoidance when needed while dramatically reducing energy consumption during periods when no wildlife are present, optimizing the balance between reliability and energy efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS10362778B2System and device to prevent wildfire damage
Publication Date: 2019.07.30 OSHEA JOHN R
  • US10362778B2 patent drawing
  • US10362778B2 patent drawing
  • US10362778B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A wildlife damage prevention device and system are provided. The wildlife damage prevention system includes a wildlife deterrence unit and one or more sensor devices associated with the wildlife deterrence unit. The wildlife deterrence unit includes an inflatable device and a base unit. The one or more sensor devices are separate from the wildlife deterrence unit and distributed around a geographic region a user intends to protect from wildlife. The one or more sensor devices sense motion, and upon sensing motion, send a signal to a receiver at the base unit. The receiver activates a blower and/or a light also at the base unit. The blower inflates the inflatable device, and the light illuminates the inflatable device.