In-Flight Landing Pad Construction to Mitigate Rocket Plume Ejecta

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Landing spacecraft on unimproved surfaces like the Moon or Mars is challenging due to the dangerous ejecta created by the spacecraft's engine plume, which can cause damage and disrupt orbital vehicles, and constructing a landing pad on these surfaces is costly and risky.

Innovation Solution

A spacecraft manufactures its own landing pad in-flight using a rocket engine to inject landing pad construction particles, forming a safe landing surface by combusting propellant and directing the plume at the construction site, with sensors to ensure the pad's safety and quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a spacecraft lands on an unimproved surface using existing technology, then the landing can be achieved, but the spacecraft suffers damage from ejecta and the cost exceeds 120 million US dollars on the Moon

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelanding safetyVSAvoidejecta damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The spacecraft performs preliminary action by constructing a landing pad in-flight before the actual landing. The pad is built by injecting particles into the engine plume, which are then deposited onto the unimproved surface to create a protective layer that mitigates ejecta damage during subsequent landing operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The landing pad serves as an intermediary between the spacecraft and the unimproved surface. This intermediate layer absorbs and redirects the harmful ejecta, protecting the spacecraft while enabling safe landing on surfaces that would otherwise be too dangerous

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If a pre-constructed landing pad is used, then landing safety is improved, but the cost stretches into the billions of dollars for Mars

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelanding safetyVSAvoidconstruction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The spacecraft performs self-service by constructing its own landing pad using materials and resources available during the mission. This eliminates the need for expensive precursor missions to deliver construction equipment and materials, as the pad is built in-flight using the spacecraft's own engine plume and injected particles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the parameters of pad construction by transitioning from ground-based pre-construction to in-flight construction. This parameter change enables the use of the spacecraft's engine plume as a construction tool, dramatically reducing the cost from billions to manageable levels while maintaining safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Power

If the spacecraft engine plume is directed at the unimproved surface, then thrust is achieved, but dangerous ejecta is created that can send lunar regolith into lunar orbit

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine thrustVSAvoidejecta velocity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention converts the harmful engine plume into a beneficial construction tool. The same plume that would normally create dangerous ejecta is instead used to propel landing pad particles onto the surface, transforming a harmful effect into a useful function for pad construction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The harmful ejecta is extracted from the direct path between the engine and the surface by introducing landing pad particles as an intermediate layer. This layer absorbs and redirects the plume energy, separating the thrust generation function from the harmful ejecta creation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enables safer and more economical landings by minimizing ejecta-related damage, eliminating the need for pre-constructed landing pads, and allowing landings in various unimproved environments.

Implementation Method 1

combusting propellant in the rocket engine to create a plume directed at a landing pad construction site

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 2

injecting landing pad construction particles into the rocket engine that are propelled toward the landing pad construction site

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRocket propulsion: Rocket

Data Source

PatentUS12522380B2Landing pad and in-flight methods of manufacturing a landing pad
Publication Date: 2026.01.13 ASTROBOTIC TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US12522380B2 patent drawing
  • US12522380B2 patent drawing
  • US12522380B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described herein is a method of constructing a landing pad using a rocket engine while in-flight. Among other benefits, this method can reduce ejecta that otherwise would occur during landing on an unimproved surface. While a spacecraft is hovering over an unimproved surface, the spacecraft can inject particles into its rocket engine, after which the particles absorb heat from the engine and are projected at ballistic speeds toward the unimproved surface to create a landing pad. After constructing the landing pad and waiting for the landing pad to cool, the spacecraft can land on the landing pad. Also described herein are landing pads created from such particles as they impact the surface in a disc splat mode into the unimproved surface.