Influence Score System for Social E-Commerce Review Reliability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In e-commerce environments, consumers face challenges in determining the reliability and trustworthiness of product and service reviews from unknown individuals, as conventional systems lack effective methods to assess the influence, reliability, and trustworthiness of reviewers.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that generate and display an influence score (ScoreIN) for users based on their actions within a social e-commerce network, considering factors like engagement, social and influential activities, and time decay, to provide a visible indicator of a user's influence, reliability, and trustworthiness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If user reviews are allowed from any individual in the e-commerce platform, then the quantity of reviews increases, but the reliability and trustworthiness of reviews decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantity of reviewsVSAvoidreliability of reviews
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter of review credibility by introducing an influence score that quantifies a user's reliability. This score is calculated based on multiple parameters including engagement metrics, social connections, and historical behavior, transforming the qualitative assessment of trustworthiness into a measurable parameter that can be displayed alongside reviews.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The influence score acts as an intermediary between the reviewer and the consumer. Instead of consumers directly assessing reviewer credibility, the system provides this intermediate metric that synthesizes multiple factors (engagement, social graph, behavior patterns) into a single trust indicator, facilitating more informed decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If the system tracks and analyzes user actions to determine influence scores, then the reliability of review assessment improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of influence measurementVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex task of measuring influence into distinct components: engagement metrics (likes, shares, comments), social graph analysis (connections, follower counts), and behavioral patterns (purchase history, review frequency). Each segment is calculated separately using specific algorithms, then combined to form the overall influence score, making the complex measurement manageable and interpretable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where user actions are continuously monitored, influence scores are updated in real-time, and these scores are displayed to other users. This feedback mechanism allows the system to adapt to changing user behaviors and maintain accurate reliability measurements without requiring complete system redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240212007A1Method and system for determining level of influence in a social e-commerce environment
Publication Date: 2024.06.27 TRANSFORM SR BRANDS LLC
  • US20240212007A1 patent drawing
  • US20240212007A1 patent drawing
  • US20240212007A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for generating and publishing an indicator or score representative of influence, reliability, and/or trustworthiness of reviews and other forms of commentary is based upon actions of individuals over a communication network such as a social e-commerce environment.